Authors' Values and Attitudes Towards AI-bridged Scalable Personalization of Creative Language Arts
Taewook Kim, Hyomin Han, Eytan Adar, Matthew Kay, John Joon Young Chung
Abstract
Generative AI has the potential to create a new form of interactive media: AI-bridged creative language arts (CLA), which bridge the author and audience by personalizing the author's vision to the audience's context and taste at scale. However, it is unclear what the authors' values and attitudes would be regarding AI-bridged CLA. To identify these values and attitudes, we conducted an interview study with 18 authors across eight genres (e.g., poetry, comics) by presenting speculative but realistic AI-bridged CLA scenarios. We identified three benefits derived from the dynamics between author, artifact, and audience: those that 1) authors get from the process, 2) audiences get from the artifact, and 3) authors get from the audience. We found how AI-bridged CLA would either promote or reduce these benefits, along with authors' concerns. We hope our investigation hints at how AI can provide intriguing experiences to CLA audiences while promoting authors' values.
• Human-centered computing → Empirical studies in HCI.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext a031ccd9-1cec-4d41-8bac-19c1cc97dde1Cited by top-tier papers16
- How CO2STLY Is CHI? The Carbon Footprint of Generative AI in HCI Research and What We Should Do About ItNanna Inie, Jeanette Falk, Raghavendra SelvanCHI 2025 · 33 citations
- Co-Writing with AI, on Human Terms: Aligning Research with User Demands Across the Writing ProcessMohi Reza, Jeb Thomas-Mitchell, Peter Dushniku, Nathan Laundry et al.CSCW 2025 · 29 citations
- Patchview: LLM-powered Worldbuilding with Generative Dust and Magnet VisualizationJohn Joon Young Chung, Max KreminskiUIST 2024 · 29 citations
- WhatELSE: Shaping Narrative Spaces at Configurable Level of Abstraction for AI-bridged Interactive StorytellingZhuoran Lu, Qian Zhou, Yi WangCHI 2025 · 25 citations
- Understanding Screenwriters' Practices, Attitudes, and Future Expectations in Human-AI Co-CreationYuying Tang, Haotian Li, Minghe Lan, Xiaojuan Ma et al.CHI 2025 · 16 citations
Builds on21
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- High-Resolution Image Synthesis with Latent Diffusion ModelsRobin Rombach, Andreas Blattmann, Dominik Lorenz, Patrick Esser et al.CVPR 2022 · 13,123 citations
- Generative Agents: Interactive Simulacra of Human BehaviorJoon Sung Park, Joseph C. O'Brien, Carrie Jun Cai, Meredith Ringel Morris et al.UIST 2023 · 1,882 citations
- A Watermark for Large Language ModelsJohn Kirchenbauer, Jonas Geiping, Yuxin Wen, Jonathan Katz et al.ICML 2023 · 854 citations
Related papers
- AI in Webtoon Creation: Challenges, Perceptions, and Design ImplicationsSoomin Kim, Hyeryung ChungCHI 2026 · 1 citation
- Generative AI in the Wild: Prospects, Challenges, and StrategiesYuan Sun, Eunchae Jang, Fenglong Ma, Ting WangCHI 2024 · 63 citations
- Can Good Writing Be Generative? Expert-Level AI Writing Emerges through Fine-Tuning on High Quality BooksTuhin Chakrabarty, Paramveer S. DhillonCHI 2026 · 2 citations
- Generative AI as a Mediator in Creator Collaboration: Challenges, Design Opportunities, and ConcernsHajun Kim, Jini Kim, Yunjae Josephine ChoiCSCW 2026
- "I Just Don't Want My Work Being Fed Into The AI Blender": Queer Artists on Refusing and Resisting Generative AIJordan Taylor, Joel Mire, Alicia DeVrio, Maarten Sap et al.CSCW 2026
