Detecting Violations of Differential Privacy
Zeyu Ding, Yuxin Wang, Guanhong Wang, Danfeng Zhang, Daniel Kifer
Abstract
The widespread acceptance of differential privacy has led to the publication of many sophisticated algorithms for protecting privacy. However, due to the subtle nature of this privacy definition, many such algorithms have bugs that make them violate their claimed privacy. In this paper, we consider the problem of producing counterexamples for such incorrect algorithms. The counterexamples are designed to be short and human-understandable so that the counterexample generator can be used in the development process -a developer could quickly explore variations of an algorithm and investigate where they break down. Our approach is statistical in nature. It runs a candidate algorithm many times and uses statistical tests to try to detect violations of differential privacy. An evaluation on a variety of incorrect published algorithms validates the usefulness of our approach: it correctly rejects incorrect algorithms and provides counterexamples for them within a few seconds. CCS CONCEPTS • Security and privacy → Privacy protections.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 9bdb744b-fbb2-416f-b0f2-999112046da9Cited by top-tier papers49
- Evaluating Differentially Private Machine Learning in PracticeBargav Jayaraman, David EvansUSENIX Security 2019 · 586 citations
- Auditing Differentially Private Machine Learning: How Private is Private SGD?Matthew Jagielski, Jonathan R. Ullman, Alina OpreaNeurIPS 2020 · 354 citations
- Adversary Instantiation: Lower Bounds for Differentially Private Machine LearningMilad Nasr, Shuang Song, Abhradeep Thakurta, Nicolas Papernot et al.S&P 2021 · 288 citations
- Privacy Auditing with One (1) Training RunThomas Steinke, Milad Nasr, Matthew JagielskiNeurIPS 2023 · 178 citations
- Membership Privacy for Machine Learning Models Through Knowledge TransferVirat Shejwalkar, Amir HoumansadrAAAI 2021 · 130 citations
Builds on1
Related papers
- CheckDP: An Automated and Integrated Approach for Proving Differential Privacy or Finding Precise CounterexamplesYuxin Wang, Zeyu Ding, Daniel Kifer, Danfeng ZhangCCS 2020 · 31 citations
- Testing differential privacy with dual interpretersHengchu Zhang, Edo Roth, Andreas Haeberlen, Benjamin C. Pierce et al.OOPSLA 2020 · 15 citations
- DP-Finder: Finding Differential Privacy Violations by Sampling and OptimizationBenjamin Bichsel, Timon Gehr, Dana Drachsler-Cohen, Petar Tsankov et al.CCS 2018 · 82 citations
- Group and Attack: Auditing Differential PrivacyJohan Lokna, Anouk Paradis, Dimitar I. Dimitrov, Martin T. VechevCCS 2023 · 10 citations
- "What do you want from theory alone?" Experimenting with Tight Auditing of Differentially Private Synthetic Data GenerationMeenatchi Sundaram Muthu Selva Annamalai, Georgi Ganev, Emiliano De CristofaroUSENIX Security 2024 · 24 citations
