DP-Finder: Finding Differential Privacy Violations by Sampling and Optimization
Benjamin Bichsel, Timon Gehr, Dana Drachsler-Cohen, Petar Tsankov, Martin T. Vechev
Abstract
We present DP-Finder, a novel approach and system that automatically derives lower bounds on the differential privacy enforced by algorithms. Lower bounds are practically useful as they can show tightness of existing upper bounds or even identify incorrect upper bounds. Computing a lower bound involves searching for a counterexample, defined by two neighboring inputs and a set of outputs, that identifies a large privacy violation. This is an inherently hard problem as finding such a counterexample involves inspecting a large (usually infinite) and sparse search space. To address this challenge, DP-Finder relies on two key insights. First, we introduce an effective and precise correlated sampling method to estimate the privacy violation of a counterexample. Second, we show how to obtain a differentiable version of the problem, enabling us to phrase the search task as an optimization objective to be maximized with state-of-the-art numerical optimizers. This allows us to systematically search for large privacy violations. Our experimental results indicate that DP-Finder is effective in computing differential privacy lower bounds for a number of randomized algorithms. For instance, it finds tight lower bounds in algorithms that obfuscate their input in a non-trivial fashion.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext dbddbaa4-e312-4753-949d-cb98d3e6216dCited by top-tier papers30
- Privacy Auditing with One (1) Training RunThomas Steinke, Milad Nasr, Matthew JagielskiNeurIPS 2023 · 178 citations
- Are We There Yet? Timing and Floating-Point Attacks on Differential Privacy SystemsJiankai Jin, Eleanor McMurtry, Benjamin I. P. Rubinstein, Olga OhrimenkoS&P 2022 · 57 citations
- DP-Sniper: Black-Box Discovery of Differential Privacy Violations using ClassifiersBenjamin Bichsel, Samuel Steffen, Ilija Bogunovic, Martin T. VechevS&P 2021 · 53 citations
- SoK: Differential Privacy as a Causal PropertyMichael Carl Tschantz, Shayak Sen, Anupam DattaS&P 2020 · 49 citations
- CheckDP: An Automated and Integrated Approach for Proving Differential Privacy or Finding Precise CounterexamplesYuxin Wang, Zeyu Ding, Daniel Kifer, Danfeng ZhangCCS 2020 · 31 citations
Builds on1
Related papers
- Lower Bounds for Rényi Differential Privacy in a Black-Box SettingTim Kutta, Önder Askin, Martin DunscheS&P 2024 · 7 citations
- Sequential Auditing for f-Differential PrivacyTim Kutta, Martin Dunsche, Yu Wei, Vassilis ZikasUSENIX Security 2026
- SuperDP: Differential Privacy Refutation via SupermartingalesKrishnendu Chatterjee, Ehsan Kafshdar Goharshady, Dorde ZikelicPLDI 2026
- Detecting Violations of Differential PrivacyZeyu Ding, Yuxin Wang, Guanhong Wang, Danfeng Zhang et al.CCS 2018 · 156 citations
- Learning Differentially Private MechanismsSubhajit Roy, Justin Hsu, Aws AlbarghouthiS&P 2021 · 20 citations
