Advanced Probabilistic Couplings for Differential Privacy
Gilles Barthe, Noémie Fong, Marco Gaboardi, Benjamin Grégoire, Justin Hsu, Pierre-Yves Strub
Abstract
Differential privacy is a promising formal approach to data privacy, which provides a quantitative bound on the privacy cost of an algorithm that operates on sensitive information. Several tools have been developed for the formal verification of differentially private algorithms, including program logics and type systems. However, these tools do not capture fundamental techniques that have emerged in recent years, and cannot be used for reasoning about cutting-edge differentially private algorithms. Existing techniques fail to handle three broad classes of algorithms: 1) algorithms where privacy depends on accuracy guarantees, 2) algorithms that are analyzed with the advanced composition theorem, which shows slower growth in the privacy cost, 3) algorithms that interactively accept adaptive inputs. We address these limitations with a new formalism extending apRHL [6], a relational program logic that has been used for proving differential privacy of non-interactive algorithms, and incorporating aHL [11], a (non-relational) program logic for accuracy properties. We illustrate our approach through a single running example, which exemplifies the three classes of algorithms and explores new variants of the Sparse Vector technique, a well-studied algorithm from the privacy literature. We implement our logic in EasyCrypt, and formally verify privacy. We also introduce a novel coupling technique called optimal subset coupling that may be of independent interest.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext c646878c-e296-4dde-8cdc-ac11253ebb8aCited by top-tier papers24
- Deep Models Under the GAN: Information Leakage from Collaborative Deep LearningBriland Hitaj, Giuseppe Ateniese, Fernando Pérez-CruzCCS 2017 · 1,581 citations
- Detecting Violations of Differential PrivacyZeyu Ding, Yuxin Wang, Guanhong Wang, Danfeng Zhang et al.CCS 2018 · 156 citations
- DP-Sniper: Black-Box Discovery of Differential Privacy Violations using ClassifiersBenjamin Bichsel, Samuel Steffen, Ilija Bogunovic, Martin T. VechevS&P 2021 · 53 citations
- A Programming Framework for Differential Privacy with Accuracy Concentration BoundsElisabet Lobo Vesga, Alejandro Russo, Marco GaboardiS&P 2020 · 32 citations
- CheckDP: An Automated and Integrated Approach for Proving Differential Privacy or Finding Precise CounterexamplesYuxin Wang, Zeyu Ding, Daniel Kifer, Danfeng ZhangCCS 2020 · 31 citations
Related papers
- Modular Verification of Differential Privacy in Probabilistic Higher-Order Separation LogicPhilipp G. Haselwarter, Alejandro Aguirre, Simon Oddershede Gregersen, Kwing Hei Li et al.PLDI 2026
- A Quantitative Probabilistic Relational Hoare LogicMartin Avanzini, Gilles Barthe, Davide Davoli, Benjamin GrégoirePOPL 2025 · 9 citations
- Deciding Differential Privacy for Programs with Finite Inputs and OutputsGilles Barthe, Rohit Chadha, Vishal Jagannath, A. Prasad Sistla et al.LICS 2020 · 24 citations
- Approximate Algorithms for Verifying Differential Privacy with Gaussian DistributionsBishnu Bhusal, Rohit Chadha, A. Prasad Sistla, Mahesh ViswanathanCCS 2025
- Combining Classical and Probabilistic Independence Reasoning to Verify the Security of Oblivious AlgorithmsPengbo Yan, Toby Murray, Olga Ohrimenko, Van-Thuan Pham et al.FM 2024 · 2 citations
