Auditing Differentially Private Machine Learning: How Private is Private SGD?
Matthew Jagielski, Jonathan R. Ullman, Alina Oprea
Abstract
We investigate whether Differentially Private SGD offers better privacy in practice than what is guaranteed by its state-of-the-art analysis. We do so via novel data poisoning attacks, which we show correspond to realistic privacy attacks. While previous work (Ma et al., arXiv 2019) proposed this connection between differential privacy and data poisoning as a defense against data poisoning, our use as a tool for understanding the privacy of a specific mechanism is new. More generally, our work takes a quantitative, empirical approach to understanding the privacy afforded by specific implementations of differentially private algorithms that we believe has the potential to complement and influence analytical work on differential privacy. An open-source implementation of our algorithms can be found at https://github.com/jagielski/auditing-dpsgd .
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext ec144b26-2bf3-4008-b109-825d899678f2Cited by top-tier papers105
- Extracting Training Data from Large Language ModelsNicholas Carlini, Florian Tramèr, Eric Wallace, Matthew Jagielski et al.USENIX Security 2021 · 2,866 citations
- Membership Inference Attacks From First PrinciplesNicholas Carlini, Steve Chien, Milad Nasr, Shuang Song et al.S&P 2022 · 1,049 citations
- Detecting Pretraining Data from Large Language ModelsWeijia Shi, Anirudh Ajith, Mengzhou Xia, Yangsibo Huang et al.ICLR 2024 · 365 citations
- Differentially Private Learning Needs Better Features (or Much More Data)Florian Tramèr, Dan BonehICLR 2021 · 325 citations
- Adversary Instantiation: Lower Bounds for Differentially Private Machine LearningMilad Nasr, Shuang Song, Abhradeep Thakurta, Nicolas Papernot et al.S&P 2021 · 288 citations
Builds on5
- Deep Learning with Differential PrivacyMartín Abadi, Andy Chu, Ian J. Goodfellow, H. Brendan McMahan et al.CCS 2016 · 7,620 citations
- Membership Inference Attacks Against Machine Learning ModelsReza Shokri, Marco Stronati, Congzheng Song, Vitaly ShmatikovS&P 2017 · 5,137 citations
- Evaluating Differentially Private Machine Learning in PracticeBargav Jayaraman, David EvansUSENIX Security 2019 · 586 citations
- Differentially Private Model Publishing for Deep LearningLei Yu, Ling Liu, Calton Pu, Mehmet Emre Gursoy et al.S&P 2019 · 294 citations
- Detecting Violations of Differential PrivacyZeyu Ding, Yuxin Wang, Guanhong Wang, Danfeng Zhang et al.CCS 2018 · 156 citations
Related papers
- Rethinking the Security of DP-SGD: A Corrected Analysis of Differentially Private Machine LearningWenhao Wang, Shujie Cui, Hui Cui, Xingliang YuanCCS 2026
- A General Framework for Auditing Differentially Private Machine LearningFred Lu, Joseph Munoz, Maya Fuchs, Tyler LeBlond et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 57 citations
- Evaluations of Machine Learning Privacy Defenses are MisleadingMichael Aerni, Jie Zhang, Florian TramèrCCS 2024 · 12 citations
- To Shuffle or not to Shuffle: Auditing DP-SGD with ShufflingMeenatchi Sundaram Muthu Selva Annamalai, Borja Balle, Jamie Hayes, Emiliano De CristofaroNDSS 2026 · 11 citations
- How Private are DP-SGD Implementations?Lynn Chua, Badih Ghazi, Pritish Kamath, Ravi Kumar et al.ICML 2024 · 25 citations
