"Positive reinforcement helps breed positive behavior": Moderator Perspectives on Encouraging Desirable Behavior
Charlotte Lambert, Frederick Choi, Eshwar Chandrasekharan
Abstract
The role of a moderator is often characterized as solely punitive, however, moderators have the power to not only execute reactive and punitive actions but also create norms and support the values they want to see within their communities. One way moderators can proactively foster healthy communities is through positive reinforcement, but we do not currently know whether moderators on Reddit enforce their norms by providing positive feedback to desired contributions. To fill this gap in our knowledge, we surveyed 115 Reddit moderators to build two taxonomies: one for the content and behavior that actual moderators want to encourage and another taxonomy of actions moderators take to encourage desirable contributions. We found that prosocial behavior, engaging with other users, and staying within the topic and norms of the subreddit are the most frequent behaviors that moderators want to encourage. We also found that moderators are taking actions to encourage desirable contributions, specifically through built-in Reddit mechanisms (e.g., upvoting), replying to the contribution, and explicitly approving the contribution in the moderation queue. Furthermore, moderators reported taking these actions specifically to reinforce desirable behavior to the original poster and other community members, even though many of the actions are anonymous, so the recipients are unaware that they are receiving feedback from moderators. Importantly, some moderators who do not currently provide feedback do not object to the practice. Instead, they are discouraged by the lack of explicit tools for positive reinforcement and the fact that their fellow moderators are not currently engaging in methods for encouragement. We consider the taxonomy of actions moderators take, the reasons moderators are deterred from providing encouragement, and suggestions from the moderators themselves to discuss implications for designing tools to provide positive feedback.
Ask about this paper
Ask your agent about it.
Lune has read the top-tier papers around this one, so every answer names the papers it rests on.
Cited by top-tier papers6
- Building Proactive and Instant-Reactive Safety Designs to Address Harassment in Social Virtual RealityZhehui Liao, Hanwen Zhao, Ayush Kulkarni, Shaan Singh Chattrath et al.CSCW 2025 · 2 citations
- Needling Through the Threads: A Visualization Tool for Navigating Threaded Online DiscussionsYijun Liu, Frederick Choi, Eshwar ChandrasekharanCHI 2026 · 1 citation
- "Think about it like you're a firefighter": Understanding How Reddit Moderators Use the ModqueueTanvi Bajpai, Eshwar ChandrasekharanCHI 2026 · 1 citation
- Evaluation and Facilitation of Online Discussions in the LLM Era: A SurveyKaterina Korre, Dimitris Tsirmpas, Nikos Gkoumas, Emma Cabalé et al.EMNLP 2025
- Decoding the Rule Book: Extracting Hidden Moderation Criteria from Reddit CommunitiesYoungwoo Kim, Himanshu Beniwal, Steven L. Johnson, Thomas HartvigsenEMNLP 2025
Related papers
- Does Positive Reinforcement Work?: A Quasi-Experimental Study of the Effects of Positive Feedback on RedditCharlotte Lambert, Koustuv Saha, Eshwar ChandrasekharanCHI 2025 · 24 citations
- Perceptions of Moderators as a Large-Scale Measure of Online Community GovernanceGalen Cassebeer Weld, Leon Leibmann, Amy X. Zhang, Tim AlthoffCSCW 2025
- Creator Hearts: Investigating the Impact Positive Signals from YouTube Creators in Shaping Comment Section BehaviorFrederick Choi, Charlotte Lambert, Vinay Koshy, Sowmya Pratipati et al.CHI 2025 · 5 citations
- How Founder Motivations, Goals, and Actions Influence Early Trajectories of Online CommunitiesSanjay Ram Kairam, Jeremy FooteCHI 2024 · 7 citations
- Conversations Gone Alright: Quantifying and Predicting Prosocial Outcomes in Online ConversationsJiajun Bao, Junjie Wu, Yiming Zhang, Eshwar Chandrasekharan et al.WWW 2021 · 63 citations
