Conversations Gone Alright: Quantifying and Predicting Prosocial Outcomes in Online Conversations
Jiajun Bao, Junjie Wu, Yiming Zhang, Eshwar Chandrasekharan, David Jurgens
Abstract
Online conversations can go in many directions: some turn out poorly due to antisocial behavior, while others turn out positively to the benefit of all. Research on improving online spaces has focused primarily on detecting and reducing antisocial behavior. Yet we know little about positive outcomes in online conversations and how to increase them—is a prosocial outcome simply the lack of antisocial behavior or something more? Here, we examine how conversational features lead to prosocial outcomes within online discussions. We introduce a series of new theory-inspired metrics to define prosocial outcomes such as mentoring and esteem enhancement. Using a corpus of 26M Reddit conversations, we show that these outcomes can be forecasted from the initial comment of an online conversation, with the best model providing a relative 24% improvement over human forecasting performance at ranking conversations for predicted outcome. Our results indicate that platforms can use these early cues in their algorithmic ranking of early conversations to prioritize better outcomes.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext c7d207fc-39a5-4f86-8ce3-345f10ca13f8Cited by top-tier papers16
- Effective Strategies for Crowd-Powered Cognitive Reappraisal Systems: A Field Deployment of the Flip*Doubt Web Application for Mental HealthC. Estelle Smith, William Lane, Hannah Miller Hillberg, Daniel Kluver et al.CSCW 2021 · 36 citations
- Thread With Caution: Proactively Helping Users Assess and Deescalate Tension in Their Online DiscussionsJonathan P. Chang, Charlotte Schluger, Cristian Danescu-Niculescu-MizilCSCW 2022 · 27 citations
- Community Archetypes: An Empirical Framework for Guiding Research Methodologies to Reflect User Experiences of Sense of Virtual Community on RedditGale H. Prinster, C. Estelle Smith, Chenhao Tan, Brian C. KeeganCSCW 2024 · 17 citations
- The Impact of Governance Bots on Sense of Virtual Community: Development and Validation of the GOV-BOTs ScaleC. Estelle Smith, Irfanul Alam, Chenhao Tan, Brian C. Keegan et al.CSCW 2022 · 13 citations
- Meeting Patients Where They're At: Toward the Expansion of Chaplaincy Care into Online Spiritual Care CommunitiesAlemitu Bezabih, Shadi Nourriz, Anne-Marie Snider, Rosalie Rauenzahn et al.CSCW 2025 · 9 citations
Builds on3
- ALBERT: A Lite BERT for Self-supervised Learning of Language RepresentationsZhenzhong Lan, Mingda Chen, Sebastian Goodman, Kevin Gimpel et al.ICLR 2020 · 7,418 citations
- Ten Social Dimensions of Conversations and RelationshipsMinje Choi, Luca Maria Aiello, Krisztián Zsolt Varga, Daniele QuerciaWWW 2020 · 58 citations
- A Computational Approach to Understanding Empathy Expressed in Text-Based Mental Health SupportAshish Sharma, Adam S. Miner, David C. Atkins, Tim AlthoffEMNLP 2020 · 21 citations
Related papers
- "Positive reinforcement helps breed positive behavior": Moderator Perspectives on Encouraging Desirable BehaviorCharlotte Lambert, Frederick Choi, Eshwar ChandrasekharanCSCW 2024 · 9 citations
- Empathy Practices in Social Media Discourse: A Multidimensional and Relational PerspectiveYixin Chen, Bernie Hogan, Scott A. HaleCHI 2026 · 1 citation
- Understanding Conflicts in Online ConversationsSharon Levy, Robert E. Kraut, Jane A. Yu, Kristen M. Altenburger et al.WWW 2022 · 17 citations
- The Structure of Toxic Conversations on TwitterMartin Saveski, Brandon Roy, Deb RoyWWW 2021 · 111 citations
- A Theoretically Grounded Approach to Summarizing Conversation Dynamics for Forecasting the Derailment of Online ConversationsYingxue Fu, Anaïs OllagnierACL 2026
