Understanding Conflicts in Online Conversations
Sharon Levy, Robert E. Kraut, Jane A. Yu, Kristen M. Altenburger, Yi-Chia Wang
Abstract
With the rise of social media, users from across the world are able to connect and converse with each other online. While these connections have facilitated a growth in knowledge, online discussions can also end in acrimonious conflict. Previous computational studies have focused on creating online conflict detection models from inferred labels, primarily examine disagreement but not acrimony, and do not examine the conflict’s emergence. Social science studies have investigated offline conflict, which can differ from its online form, and rarely examines its emergence. The current research aims to understand how online conflicts arise in online personal conversations. Our ground truth is a Facebook tool that allows group members to report conflict to administrators. We contrast discussions ending with a conflict report with paired non-conflict discussions from the same post. We study both user characteristics (e.g., historical user-to-user interactions) and conversation dynamics (e.g., changes in emotional intensity over the course of the conversation). We use logistic regression to identify the features that predict conflict. User characteristics such as the commenter’s gender and previous involvement in negative online activity are strong indicators of conflict. Conversational dynamics, such as an increase in person-oriented discussion, are also important signals of conflict. These results help us understand how conflicts emerge and suggest better detection models and ways to alert group administrators and members early on to mediate the conversation.
Ask about this paper
Ask your agent about it.
Lune has read the top-tier papers around this one, so every answer names the papers it rests on.
Your agent calls
Lunesearch_papers
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers get abb1796a-08f1-48c5-a22a-5f16bee3a3f4Cited by top-tier papers5
- LLM-Based Agent Society Investigation: Collaboration and Confrontation in Avalon GameplayYihuai Lan, Zhiqiang Hu, Lei Wang, Yang Wang et al.EMNLP 2024 · 10 citations
- Context-Aware Sentiment Forecasting via LLM-based Multi-Perspective Role-Playing AgentsFanhang Man, Huandong Wang, Jianjie Fang, Zhaoyi Deng et al.ACL 2025 · 5 citations
- Power Echoes: Investigating Moderation Biases in Online Power-Asymmetric ConflictsYaqiong Li, Peng Zhang, Peixu Hou, Kainan Tu et al.CHI 2026 · 2 citations
- Twits, Toxic Tweets, and Tribal Tendencies: Trends in Politically Polarized Posts on TwitterHans W. A. Hanley, Zakir DurumericCSCW 2025
- Toxicity Ahead: Forecasting Conversational Derailment on GitHubMia Mohammad Imran, Robert Zita, Rahat Rizvi Rahman, Preetha Chatterjee et al.ICSE 2026
Related papers
- Don't Let Me Be Misunderstood: Comparing Intentions and Perceptions in Online DiscussionsJonathan P. Chang, Justin Cheng, Cristian Danescu-Niculescu-MizilWWW 2020 · 29 citations
- Leveraging Conflicts in Social Media Posts: Unintended Offense DatasetChe-Wei Tsai, Yen-Hao Huang, Tsu-Keng Liao, Didier Estrada et al.EMNLP 2024
- Conversations Gone Alright: Quantifying and Predicting Prosocial Outcomes in Online ConversationsJiajun Bao, Junjie Wu, Yiming Zhang, Eshwar Chandrasekharan et al.WWW 2021 · 63 citations
- Someone Is Wrong on the Internet: Having Hard Conversations in Online SpacesAmanda Baughan, Justin Petelka, Catherine Jaekyung Yoo, Jack Lo et al.CSCW 2021 · 29 citations
- Do Differences in Values Influence Disagreements in Online Discussions?Michiel van der Meer, Piek Vossen, Catholijn M. Jonker, Pradeep K. MurukannaiahEMNLP 2023 · 2 citations
