"Think about it like you're a firefighter": Understanding How Reddit Moderators Use the Modqueue
Tanvi Bajpai, Eshwar Chandrasekharan
Abstract
On Reddit, the moderation queue (modqueue) is the platform’s primary interface for reviewing user-reported and automatically flagged content. Despite its central role in Reddit’s community-reliant moderation model, little is known about how moderators actually use it in practice. To address this gap, we surveyed 110 moderators, who collectively oversee more than 400 subreddits, to understand how the modqueue fits into their workflows and what its design enables or constrains. We find substantial variation in modqueue use: some moderators treat it as a daily checklist, others use it to identify patterns or emerging issues, and many routinely leave the interface to gather additional context or coordinate with teammates. Respondents also described persistent challenges, including coordination issues such as collisions, incomplete or noisy information signals, and friction created by fragmented interface versions and reliance on third-party tools. Taken together, we show the modqueue is neither a one-size-fits-all solution nor sufficient on its own for supporting moderator review. We outline opportunities for more modular, better-integrated moderation infrastructures that support both item-level review and broader governance activities, and that better align with the collaborative and value-driven nature of volunteer moderation on Reddit.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext e8faf643-f497-45e5-a2b4-5d3227766af5Cited by top-tier papers2
- Needling Through the Threads: A Visualization Tool for Navigating Threaded Online DiscussionsYijun Liu, Frederick Choi, Eshwar ChandrasekharanCHI 2026 · 1 citation
- The Language of Approval: Identifying the Drivers of Positive Feedback OnlineAgam Goyal, Charlotte Lambert, Eshwar ChandrasekharanCHI 2026 · 1 citation
Builds on16
- PolicyKit: Building Governance in Online CommunitiesAmy X. Zhang, Grant Hugh, Michael S. BernsteinUIST 2020 · 60 citations
- After Violation But Before Sanction: Understanding Volunteer Moderators' Profiling Processes Toward Violators in Live Streaming CommunitiesJie Cai, Donghee Yvette WohnCSCW 2021 · 34 citations
- Coordination and Collaboration: How do Volunteer Moderators Work as a Team in Live Streaming Communities?Jie Cai, Donghee Yvette WohnCHI 2022 · 34 citations
- Wisdom of Two Crowds: Misinformation Moderation on Reddit and How to Improve this Process - A Case Study of COVID-19Lia Bozarth, Jane Im, Christopher Chad Quarles, Ceren BudakCSCW 2023 · 31 citations
- Thread With Caution: Proactively Helping Users Assess and Deescalate Tension in Their Online DiscussionsJonathan P. Chang, Charlotte Schluger, Cristian Danescu-Niculescu-MizilCSCW 2022 · 27 citations
Related papers
- AppealMod: Inducing Friction to Reduce Moderator Workload of Handling User AppealsShubham Atreja, Jane Im, Paul Resnick, Libby HemphillCSCW 2024 · 8 citations
- Perceptions of Moderators as a Large-Scale Measure of Online Community GovernanceGalen Cassebeer Weld, Leon Leibmann, Amy X. Zhang, Tim AlthoffCSCW 2025
- "How Do You Quantify How Racist Something Is?": Color-Blind Moderation in Decentralized GovernanceQunfang Wu, Bryan C. SemaanCSCW 2023 · 11 citations
- Toxicity Detection is NOT all you Need: Measuring the Gaps to Supporting Volunteer Content Moderators through a User-Centric MethodYang Trista Cao, Lovely-Frances Domingo, Sarah A. Gilbert, Michelle L. Mazurek et al.EMNLP 2024 · 4 citations
- "Positive reinforcement helps breed positive behavior": Moderator Perspectives on Encouraging Desirable BehaviorCharlotte Lambert, Frederick Choi, Eshwar ChandrasekharanCSCW 2024 · 9 citations
