Language Models as Causal Effect Generators
Lucius E. J. Bynum, Kyunghyun Cho
Abstract
In this work, we present sequence-driven structural causal models (SD-SCMs), a framework for specifying causal models with user-defined structure and language-model-defined mechanisms. We characterize how an SD-SCM enables sampling from observational, interventional, and counterfactual distributions according to the desired causal structure. We then leverage this procedure to propose a new type of benchmark for causal inference methods, generating individual-level counterfactual data to test treatment effect estimation. We create an example benchmark consisting of thousands of datasets, and test a suite of popular estimation methods for average, conditional average, and individual treatment effect estimation. We find under this benchmark that (1) causal methods outperform non-causal methods and that (2) even state-of-the-art methods struggle with individualized effect estimation, suggesting this benchmark captures some inherent difficulties in causal estimation. Apart from generating data, this same technique can underpin the auditing of language models for (un)desirable causal effects, such as misinformation or discrimination. We believe SD-SCMs can serve as a useful tool in any application that would benefit from sequential data with controllable causal structure.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 8ee0972b-6e4b-4bf3-9b27-1d5ee3f9e429Builds on3
- Deep Structural Causal Models for Tractable Counterfactual InferenceNick Pawlowski, Daniel Coelho de Castro, Ben GlockerNeurIPS 2020 · 353 citations
- CLadder: A Benchmark to Assess Causal Reasoning Capabilities of Language ModelsZhijing Jin, Yuen Chen, Felix Leeb, Luigi Gresele et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 74 citations
- How and Why to Use Experimental Data to Evaluate Methods for Observational Causal InferenceAmanda Gentzel, Purva Pruthi, David D. JensenICML 2021 · 22 citations
Related papers
- CauSciBench: Can LLMs Automate Causal Inference in Real-World Scientific Research?Sawal Acharya, Terry J Zhang, Andrew Kim, Rahul B Shrestha et al.ICML 2026
- Causal-HalBench: Uncovering LVLMs Object Hallucinations Through Causal InterventionZhe Xu, Zhicai Wang, Junkang Wu, Jinda Lu et al.AAAI 2026
- End-To-End Causal Effect Estimation from Unstructured Natural Language DataNikita Dhawan, Leonardo Cotta, Karen Ullrich, Rahul G. Krishnan et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 24 citations
- ConTSG-Bench: A Unified Benchmark for Conditional Time Series GenerationShaocheng Lan, Shuqi Gu, Zhangzhi Xiong, Kan RenICML 2026 · 3 citations
- CausalProfiler: Generating Synthetic Benchmarks for Rigorous and Transparent Evaluation of Causal Machine LearningPanayiotis Panayiotou, Audrey Poinsot, Alessandro Leite, Nicolas CHESNEAU et al.ICML 2026
