Causal-HalBench: Uncovering LVLMs Object Hallucinations Through Causal Intervention
Zhe Xu, Zhicai Wang, Junkang Wu, Jinda Lu, Xiang Wang
Abstract
Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) often suffer from object hallucination, making erroneous judgments about the presence of objects in images. We propose this primarily stems from spurious correlations arising when models strongly associate highly co-occurring objects during training, leading to hallucinated objects influenced by visual context. Current benchmarks mainly focus on hallucination detection but lack a formal characterization and quantitative evaluation of spurious correlations in LVLMs. To address this, we introduce causal analysis into the object recognition scenario of LVLMs, establishing a Structural Causal Model (SCM). Utilizing the language of causality, we formally define spurious correlations arising from co-occurrence bias. To quantify the influence induced by these spurious correlations, we develop Causal-HalBench, a benchmark specifically constructed with counterfactual samples and integrated with comprehensive causal metrics designed to assess model robustness against spurious correlations. Concurrently, we propose an extensible pipeline for the construction of these counterfactual samples, leveraging the capabilities of proprietary LVLMs and Text-to-Image (T2I) models for their generation. Our evaluations on mainstream LVLMs using Causal-HalBench demonstrate these models exhibit susceptibility to spurious correlations, albeit to varying extents.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext b8bf167e-4e23-4553-ae09-4c663b4995fcBuilds on15
- Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language SupervisionAlec Radford, Jong Wook Kim, Chris Hallacy, Aditya Ramesh et al.ICML 2021 · 47,906 citations
- Visual Instruction TuningHaotian Liu, Chunyuan Li, Qingyang Wu, Yong Jae LeeNeurIPS 2023 · 11,349 citations
- Scaling Up Visual and Vision-Language Representation Learning With Noisy Text SupervisionChao Jia, Yinfei Yang, Ye Xia, Yi-Ting Chen et al.ICML 2021 · 5,401 citations
- InstructBLIP: Towards General-purpose Vision-Language Models with Instruction TuningWenliang Dai, Junnan Li, Dongxu Li, Anthony Meng Huat Tiong et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 4,013 citations
- CLIPScore: A Reference-free Evaluation Metric for Image CaptioningJack Hessel, Ari Holtzman, Maxwell Forbes, Ronan Le Bras et al.EMNLP 2021 · 937 citations
Related papers
- Evaluating and Analyzing Relationship Hallucinations in Large Vision-Language ModelsMingrui Wu, Jiayi Ji, Oucheng Huang, Jiale Li et al.ICML 2024 · 32 citations
- VisDiaHalBench: A Visual Dialogue Benchmark For Diagnosing Hallucination in Large Vision-Language ModelsQingxing Cao, Junhao Cheng, Xiaodan Liang, Liang LinACL 2024 · 3 citations
- MVI-Bench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Evaluating Robustness to Misleading Visual Inputs in LVLMsHuiyi Chen, Jiawei Peng, Dehai Min, Changchang Sun et al.ICML 2026 · 18 citations
- Multi-Object Hallucination in Vision Language ModelsXuweiyi Chen, Ziqiao Ma, Xuejun Zhang, Sihan Xu et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 77 citations
- CausalVLBench: Benchmarking Visual Causal Reasoning in Large Vision-Language ModelsAneesh Komanduri, Karuna Bhaila, Xintao WuEMNLP 2025
