MVI-Bench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Evaluating Robustness to Misleading Visual Inputs in LVLMs
Huiyi Chen, Jiawei Peng, Dehai Min, Changchang Sun, Kaijie Chen, Yan Yan, Xu Yang, Lu Cheng
Abstract
Evaluating the robustness of Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) is essential for their continued development and responsible deployment. However, existing robustness benchmarks largely focus on hallucination or misleading textual inputs, overlooking the critical challenge posed by misleading visual inputs in assessing visual understanding. To fill this gap, we introduce MVI-Bench, the first comprehensive benchmark specially designed for evaluating how Misleading Visual Inputs undermine the robustness of LVLMs. Grounded in fundamental visual primitives, the design of MVI-Bench centers on three hierarchical levels of misleading visual inputs: Visual Concept, Visual Attribute, and Visual Relationship. Using this taxonomy, we curate six representative categories and compile 1,248 expertly annotated VQA instances. To facilitate fine-grained robustness evaluation, we further introduce MVI-Sensitivity, a novel metric that characterizes LVLM robustness. Empirical results across 18 state-of-the-art LVLMs uncover pronounced vulnerabilities to misleading visual inputs, and our in-depth analyses on MVI-Bench provide actionable insights that can guide the development of more reliable and robust LVLMs.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 97d86978-9cbc-4573-a192-4ac8d2b849ccCited by top-tier papers3
- The Boy Who Cried Wolf: Adversarial Misclassification of Safe Inputs as Unsafe in Multimodal GuardrailsShuo Shi, Rui Yin, Naen Xu, Jiahao Chen et al.KDD 2026 · 1 citation
- TSRBench: A Comprehensive Multi-task Multi-modal Time Series Reasoning Benchmark for Generalist ModelsFangxu Yu, Xingang Guo, Lingzhi Yuan, Haoqiang Kang et al.ICML 2026
- Rethinking LLM Ensembling from the Perspective of Mixture ModelsJiale Fu, Yuchu Jiang, PeiJun Wu, Chonghan Liu et al.ICML 2026
Builds on33
- Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language SupervisionAlec Radford, Jong Wook Kim, Chris Hallacy, Aditya Ramesh et al.ICML 2021 · 47,906 citations
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- Visual Instruction TuningHaotian Liu, Chunyuan Li, Qingyang Wu, Yong Jae LeeNeurIPS 2023 · 11,349 citations
- InstructBLIP: Towards General-purpose Vision-Language Models with Instruction TuningWenliang Dai, Junnan Li, Dongxu Li, Anthony Meng Huat Tiong et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 4,013 citations
- Large Language Models Are Not Robust Multiple Choice SelectorsChujie Zheng, Hao Zhou, Fandong Meng, Jie Zhou et al.ICLR 2024 · 424 citations
Related papers
- VisDiaHalBench: A Visual Dialogue Benchmark For Diagnosing Hallucination in Large Vision-Language ModelsQingxing Cao, Junhao Cheng, Xiaodan Liang, Liang LinACL 2024 · 3 citations
- Evaluating and Analyzing Relationship Hallucinations in Large Vision-Language ModelsMingrui Wu, Jiayi Ji, Oucheng Huang, Jiale Li et al.ICML 2024 · 32 citations
- AVI-Bench: Toward Human-like Audio-Visual Intelligence of Omni-MLLMsYaoting Wang, Ziyi Zhang, Wenming Tu, Shaoxuan Xu et al.ICML 2026
- Causal-HalBench: Uncovering LVLMs Object Hallucinations Through Causal InterventionZhe Xu, Zhicai Wang, Junkang Wu, Jinda Lu et al.AAAI 2026
- Are VLMs Ready for Autonomous Driving? An Empirical Study from the Reliability, Data, and Metric PerspectivesShaoyuan Xie, Lingdong Kong, Yuhao Dong, Chonghao Sima et al.ICCV 2025 · 25 citations
