End-To-End Causal Effect Estimation from Unstructured Natural Language Data
Nikita Dhawan, Leonardo Cotta, Karen Ullrich, Rahul G. Krishnan, Chris J. Maddison
Abstract
Knowing the effect of an intervention is critical for human decision-making, but current approaches for causal effect estimation rely on manual data collection and structuring, regardless of the causal assumptions. This increases both the cost and time-to-completion for studies. We show how large, diverse observational text data can be mined with large language models (LLMs) to produce inexpensive causal effect estimates under appropriate causal assumptions. We introduce NATURAL, a novel family of causal effect estimators built with LLMs that operate over datasets of unstructured text. Our estimators use LLM conditional distributions (over variables of interest, given the text data) to assist in the computation of classical estimators of causal effect. We overcome a number of technical challenges to realize this idea, such as automating data curation and using LLMs to impute missing information. We prepare six (two synthetic and four real) observational datasets, paired with corresponding ground truth in the form of randomized trials, which we used to systematically evaluate each step of our pipeline. NATURAL estimators demonstrate remarkable performance, yielding causal effect estimates that fall within 3 percentage points of their ground truth counterparts, including on real-world Phase 3/4 clinical trials. Our results suggest that unstructured text data is a rich source of causal effect information, and NATURAL is a first step towards an automated pipeline to tap this resource.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext c14b54fc-76e9-426e-991c-33237b63bbbeCited by top-tier papers8
- Efficient Randomized Experiments Using Foundation ModelsPiersilvio De Bartolomeis, Javier Abad, Guanbo Wang, Konstantin Donhauser et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 22 citations
- LLM-Driven Treatment Effect Estimation Under Inference Time Text ConfoundingYuchen Ma, Dennis Frauen, Jonas Schweisthal, Stefan FeuerriegelNeurIPS 2025 · 7 citations
- Ice Cream Doesn't Cause Drowning: Benchmarking LLMs Against Statistical Pitfalls in Causal InferenceJin Du, Li Chen, Xun Xian, An Luo et al.ICLR 2026 · 4 citations
- Eliciting Causal Abilities in Large Language Models for Reasoning TasksYajing Wang, Zongwei Luo, Jingzhe Wang, Zhanke Zhou et al.AAAI 2025 · 1 citation
- OCEAN: Offline Chain-of-thought Evaluation and Alignment in Large Language ModelsJunda Wu, Xintong Li, Ruoyu Wang, Yu Xia et al.ICLR 2025
Builds on2
Related papers
- Deep Multi-Modal Structural Equations For Causal Effect Estimation With Unstructured ProxiesShachi Deshpande, Kaiwen Wang, Dhruv Sreenivas, Zheng Li et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 15 citations
- iTAG: Inverse Design for Natural Text Generation with Accurate Causal Graph AnnotationsWenshuo Wang, Boyu Cao, Nan Zhuang, Wei LiACL 2026
- Multistage Feedback-Driven Causal Discovery from Textual Data with Large Language ModelsJuntao Yang, Dayuan Cao, Kui Yu, Xiang Wang et al.WWW 2026
- Discovery of the Hidden World with Large Language ModelsChenxi Liu, Yongqiang Chen, Tongliang Liu, Mingming Gong et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 26 citations
- CauSciBench: Can LLMs Automate Causal Inference in Real-World Scientific Research?Sawal Acharya, Terry J Zhang, Andrew Kim, Rahul B Shrestha et al.ICML 2026
