Eliciting Causal Abilities in Large Language Models for Reasoning Tasks
Yajing Wang, Zongwei Luo, Jingzhe Wang, Zhanke Zhou, Yongqiang Chen, Bo Han
Abstract
Prompt optimization automatically refines prompting expressions, unlocking the full potential of LLMs in downstream tasks. However, current prompt optimization methods are costly to train and lack sufficient interpretability. This paper proposes enhancing LLMs' reasoning performance by eliciting their causal inference ability from prompting instructions to correct answers. Specifically, we introduce the Self-Causal Instruction Enhancement (SCIE) method, which enables LLMs to generate high-quality, low-quantity observational data, then estimates the causal effect based on these data, and ultimately generates instructions with the optimized causal effect. In SCIE, the instructions are treated as the treatment, and textual features are used to process natural language, establishing causal relationships through treatments between instructions and downstream tasks. Additionally, we propose applying Object-Relational (OR) principles, where the uncovered causal relationships are treated as the inheritable class across task objects, ensuring low-cost reusability. Extensive experiments demonstrate that our method effectively generates instructions that enhance reasoning performance with reduced training cost of prompts, leveraging interpretable textual features to provide actionable insights.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext bec83884-90d8-48c7-8e5a-b697181c9d3aCited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on13
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- Large Language Models are Zero-Shot ReasonersTakeshi Kojima, Shixiang Shane Gu, Machel Reid, Yutaka Matsuo et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 8,168 citations
- Large Language Models as OptimizersChengrun Yang, Xuezhi Wang, Yifeng Lu, Hanxiao Liu et al.ICLR 2024 · 817 citations
- Plan-and-Solve Prompting: Improving Zero-Shot Chain-of-Thought Reasoning by Large Language ModelsLei Wang, Wanyu Xu, Yihuai Lan, Zhiqiang Hu et al.ACL 2023 · 249 citations
- MathScale: Scaling Instruction Tuning for Mathematical ReasoningZhengyang Tang, Xingxing Zhang, Benyou Wang, Furu WeiICML 2024 · 163 citations
Related papers
- Rethinking Chain-of-Thought from the Perspective of Self-TrainingZongqian Wu, Baoduo Xu, Ruochen Cui, Mengmeng Zhan et al.ICML 2025
- Unlocking the Black Box of Latent Reasoning: An Interpretability-Guided Approach to InterventionShuochen Chang, Tong Bai, Xiaofeng Zhang, Qianli Ma et al.ACL 2026 · 1 citation
- DeCoT: Debiasing Chain-of-Thought for Knowledge-Intensive Tasks in Large Language Models via Causal InterventionJunda Wu, Tong Yu, Xiang Chen, Haoliang Wang et al.ACL 2024
- SciBench: Evaluating College-Level Scientific Problem-Solving Abilities of Large Language ModelsXiaoxuan Wang, Ziniu Hu, Pan Lu, Yanqiao Zhu et al.ICML 2024 · 220 citations
- Causal Sufficiency and Necessity Improves Chain-of-Thought ReasoningXiangning Yu, Zhuohan Wang, Linyi Yang, Haoxuan Li et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 19 citations
