PhysCov: Physical Test Coverage for Autonomous Vehicles
Carl Hildebrandt, Meriel von Stein, Sebastian G. Elbaum
Abstract
Adequately exercising the behaviors of autonomous vehicles is fundamental to their validation. However, quantifying an autonomous vehicle’s testing adequacy is challenging as the system’s behavior is influenced both by its state as well as its physical environment. To address this challenge, our work builds on two insights. First, data sensed by an autonomous vehicle provides a unique spatial signature of the physical environment inputs. Second, given the vehicle’s current state, inputs residing outside the autonomous vehicle’s physically reachable regions are less relevant to its behavior. Building on those insights, we introduce an abstraction that enables the computation of a physical environment-state coverage metric, PhysCov. The abstraction combines the sensor readings with a physical reachability analysis based on the vehicle’s state and dynamics to determine the region of the environment that may affect the autonomous vehicle. It then characterizes that region through a parameterizable geometric approximation that can trade quality for cost. Tests with the same characterizations are deemed to have had similar internal states and exposed to similar environments and thus likely to exercise the same set of behaviors, while tests with distinct characterizations will increase PhysCov. A study on two simulated and one real system’s dataset examines PhysCovs’s ability to quantify an autonomous vehicle’s test suite, showcases its characterization cost and precision, investigates its correlation with failures found and potential for test selection, and assesses its ability to distinguish among real-world scenarios.
Ask about this paper
Ask your agent about it.
Lune has read the top-tier papers around this one, so every answer names the papers it rests on.
Your agent calls
Lunesearch_papers
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers get 8dfece3f-be05-47ed-9497-6a68cdddfac4Cited by top-tier papers4
- DiaVio: LLM-Empowered Diagnosis of Safety Violations in ADS Simulation TestingYou Lu, Yifan Tian, Yuyang Bi, Bihuan Chen et al.ISSTA 2024 · 9 citations
- On-Demand Scenario Generation for Testing Automated Driving SystemsSongyang Yan, Xiaodong Zhang, Kunkun Hao, Haojie Xin et al.FSE 2025 · 6 citations
- Decictor: Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Decision-Making in Autonomous Driving SystemsMingfei Cheng, Xiaofei Xie, Yuan Zhou, Junjie Wang et al.ICSE 2025 · 4 citations
- When Autonomous Vehicle Meets V2X Cooperative Perception: How Far Are We?An Guo, Shuoxiao Zhang, Enyi Tang, Xinyu Gao et al.ASE 2025 · 1 citation
Related papers
- S3C: Spatial Semantic Scene Coverage for Autonomous VehiclesTrey Woodlief, Felipe Toledo, Sebastian G. Elbaum, Matthew B. DwyerICSE 2024 · 11 citations
- Towards Reliable AI: Adequacy Metrics for Ensuring the Quality of System-level Testing of Autonomous VehiclesNeelofar, Aldeida AletiICSE 2024 · 11 citations
- State Field Coverage: A Metric for Oracle QualityFacundo Molina, Nazareno Aguirre, Alessandra GorlaASE 2025 · 1 citation
- Simulation-Based Validation for Autonomous Driving SystemsChangwen Li, Joseph Sifakis, Qiang Wang, Rongjie Yan et al.ISSTA 2023 · 17 citations
- Reachable Coverage: Estimating Saturation in FuzzingDanushka Liyanage, Marcel Böhme, Chakkrit Tantithamthavorn, Stephan LippICSE 2023 · 14 citations
