Decictor: Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Decision-Making in Autonomous Driving Systems
Mingfei Cheng, Xiaofei Xie, Yuan Zhou, Junjie Wang, Guozhu Meng, Kairui Yang
Abstract
Autonomous Driving System (ADS) testing is crucial in ADS development, with the current primary focus being on safety. However, the evaluation of non-safety-critical performance, particularly the ADS's ability to make optimal decisions and produce optimal paths for autonomous vehicles (AVs), is also vital to ensure the intelligence and reduce risks of AVs. Currently, there is little work dedicated to assessing the robustness of ADSs' path-planning decisions (PPDs), i.e., whether an ADS can maintain the optimal PPD after an insignificant change in the environment. The key challenges include the lack of clear oracles for assessing PPD optimality and the difficulty in searching for scenarios that lead to non-optimal PPDs. To fill this gap, in this paper, we focus on evaluating the robustness of ADSs' PPDs and propose the first method, Decictor, for generating nonoptimal decision scenarios (NoDSs), where the ADS does not plan optimal paths for AVs. Decictor comprises three main components: Non-invasive Mutation, Consistency Check, and Feedback. To overcome the oracle challenge, Non-invasive Mutation is devised to implement conservative modifications, ensuring the preservation of the original optimal path in the mutated scenarios. Subsequently, the Consistency Check is applied to determine the presence of nonoptimal PPDs by comparing the driving paths in the original and mutated scenarios. To deal with the challenge of large environment space, we design Feedback metrics that integrate spatial and temporal dimensions of the AV's movement. These metrics are crucial for effectively steering the generation of NoDSs. Therefore, Decictor can generate NoDSs by generating new scenarios and then identifying NoDSs in the new scenarios. We evaluate Decictor on Baidu Apollo, an open-source and production-grade ADS. The experimental results validate the effectiveness of Decictor in detecting non-optimal PPDs of ADSs. It generates 63.9 NoDSs in total, while the best-performing baseline only detects 35.4 NoDSs.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext b6d6a622-b262-4d2d-ae85-7d4d40d8112cCited by top-tier papers3
- MoDitector: Module-Directed Testing for Autonomous Driving SystemsRenzhi Wang, Mingfei Cheng, Xiaofei Xie, Yuan Zhou et al.ISSTA 2025 · 3 citations
- From Particles to Perils: SVGD-Based Hazardous Scenario Generation for Autonomous Driving Systems TestingLinfeng Liang, Xiao Cheng, Tsong Yueh Chen, Xi ZhengFSE 2026
- Learning from the Test: Self-Referential Differential Testing for Deep RL AgentsJunda He, Jieke Shi, Zhou Yang, Mingfei Cheng et al.ISSTA 2026
Builds on30
- Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural NetworksNicholas Carlini, David A. WagnerS&P 2017 · 9,786 citations
- Distillation as a Defense to Adversarial Perturbations Against Deep Neural NetworksNicolas Papernot, Patrick D. McDaniel, Xi Wu, Somesh Jha et al.S&P 2016 · 3,275 citations
- Adversarial Sensor Attack on LiDAR-based Perception in Autonomous DrivingYulong Cao, Chaowei Xiao, Benjamin Cyr, Yimeng Zhou et al.CCS 2019 · 626 citations
- End-to-End Urban Driving by Imitating a Reinforcement Learning CoachZhejun Zhang, Alexander Liniger, Dengxin Dai, Fisher Yu et al.ICCV 2021 · 313 citations
- Globally-Robust Neural NetworksKlas Leino, Zifan Wang, Matt FredriksonICML 2021 · 150 citations
Related papers
- MOSAT: finding safety violations of autonomous driving systems using multi-objective genetic algorithmHaoxiang Tian, Yan Jiang, Guoquan Wu, Jiren Yan et al.FSE 2022 · 74 citations
- Generating Critical Test Scenarios for Autonomous Driving Systems via Influential Behavior PatternsHaoxiang Tian, Guoquan Wu, Jiren Yan, Yan Jiang et al.ASE 2022 · 24 citations
- On the Robustness Evaluation of 3D Obstacle Detection Against Specifications in Autonomous DrivingTri Minh-Triet Pham, Bo Yang, Jinqiu YangASE 2025 · 1 citation
- Doppelgänger Test Generation for Revealing Bugs in Autonomous Driving SoftwareYuqi Huai, Yuntianyi Chen, Sumaya Almanee, Tuan Ngo et al.ICSE 2023 · 35 citations
- META²V2V: Revealing Behavioural Deviations under Mutual Perception in Multi-Vehicle Autonomous DrivingLejin Li, Xiao-Yi Zhang, Shuncheng Tang, Zhenya Zhang et al.ICSE 2026
