MoDitector: Module-Directed Testing for Autonomous Driving Systems
Renzhi Wang, Mingfei Cheng, Xiaofei Xie, Yuan Zhou, Lei Ma
Abstract
Testing Autonomous Driving Systems (ADSs) is crucial for ensuring their safety, reliability, and performance. Despite numerous testing methods available that can generate diverse and challenging scenarios to uncover potential vulnerabilities, these methods often treat ADS as a black-box, primarily focusing on identifying system-level failures like collisions or near-misses without pinpointing the specific modules responsible for these failures. This lack of root causes understanding for the failures hinders effective debugging and subsequent system repair. Furthermore, current approaches often fall short in generating violations that adequately test the individual modules of an ADS from a system-level perspective, such as perception, prediction, planning, and control. To bridge this gap, we introduce MoDitector, a root-cause-aware testing method for ADS that generates safety-critical scenarios specifically designed to expose weaknesses in targeted ADS modules. Unlike existing approaches, MoDitector not only produces scenarios that lead to violations but also pinpoints the specific module responsible for each failure. Specifically, our approach introduces Module-Specific Oracles to automatically detect module-level errors and identify the root-cause module responsible for system-level violations. To effectively generate module-specific failures, we propose a module-directed testing strategy that integrates Module-Specific Feedback and Adaptive Scenario Generation to guide the testing process. We evaluated MoDitector across four critical ADS modules and four representative testing scenarios. The results demonstrate that MoDitector can effectively and efficiently generate scenarios in which failures can be attributed to specific targeted modules. In total, MoDitector generated 216.7 expected scenarios, significantly outperforming the best baseline, which identified only 79.0 scenarios. Our approach represents a significant innovation in ADS testing by focusing on the identification and rectification of module-specific errors within the system, moving beyond conventional black-box failure detection.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 70a42be7-21ff-4106-ab08-d209c6fd5d7cCited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on16
- Misbehaviour prediction for autonomous driving systemsAndrea Stocco, Michael Weiss, Marco Calzana, Paolo TonellaICSE 2020 · 138 citations
- On Adversarial Robustness of Trajectory Prediction for Autonomous VehiclesQingzhao Zhang, Shengtuo Hu, Jiachen Sun, Qi Alfred Chen et al.CVPR 2022 · 132 citations
- Testing of autonomous driving systems: where are we and where should we go?Guannan Lou, Yao Deng, Xi Zheng, Mengshi Zhang et al.FSE 2022 · 85 citations
- Efficient Online Testing for DNN-Enabled Systems using Surrogate-Assisted and Many-Objective OptimizationFitash Ul Haq, Donghwan Shin, Lionel C. BriandICSE 2022 · 77 citations
- BehAVExplor: Behavior Diversity Guided Testing for Autonomous Driving SystemsMingfei Cheng, Yuan Zhou, Xiaofei XieISSTA 2023 · 59 citations
Related papers
- Poirot: Automatic Root Cause Analysis of Safety Violations in ADS Simulation Testing via Hypothetical ReasoningYou Lu, Dingji Wang, Kun Zhang, Bihuan Chen et al.ISSTA 2026
- MOSAT: finding safety violations of autonomous driving systems using multi-objective genetic algorithmHaoxiang Tian, Yan Jiang, Guoquan Wu, Jiren Yan et al.FSE 2022 · 74 citations
- DeFT: Maintaining Determinism and Extracting Unit Tests for Autonomous Driving PlanningYuqi Huai, Yuntianyi Chen, Ziwen Wan, Qi Alfred Chen et al.ICSE 2026
- Testing the Fault-Tolerance of Multi-sensor Fusion Perception in Autonomous Driving SystemsHaoxiang Tian, Wenqiang Ding, Xingshuo Han, Guoquan Wu et al.ISSTA 2025 · 2 citations
- Generating Realistic and Diverse Tests for LiDAR-Based Perception SystemsGarrett Christian, Trey Woodlief, Sebastian G. ElbaumICSE 2023 · 11 citations
