Testing the Fault-Tolerance of Multi-sensor Fusion Perception in Autonomous Driving Systems
Haoxiang Tian, Wenqiang Ding, Xingshuo Han, Guoquan Wu, An Guo, Junqi Zhang, Wei Chen, Jun Wei, Tianwei Zhang
Abstract
Production-level Autonomous Driving Systems (ADSs), such as Google Waymo and Baidu Apollo, typically rely on the multi-sensor fusion (MSF) strategy to perceive their surroundings. This strategy increases the perception robustness by combining the respective strengths of the cameras and LiDAR, directly affecting the safety-critical driving decisions of autonomous vehicles (AVs). However, in real-world autonomous driving scenarios, both cameras and LiDAR are prone to various faults that can significantly impact the decision-making and subsequent behaviors of ADSs. It is important to thoroughly test the robustness of MSF during development. Existing testing methods only focus on the identification of corner cases that MSF fails to detect. However, there is still a lack of investigation on how sensor faults affect the system-level behaviors of ADSs. To address this gap, we present FADE, the first testing methodology to comprehensively assess the fault tolerance of MSF perception-based ADSs. We systematically build fault models for both cameras and LiDAR in AVs and inject these faults into MSF-based ADSs to test their behaviors in various testing scenarios. To effectively and efficiently explore the parameter spaces of sensor fault models, we design a feedback-guided differential fuzzer to uncover safety violations of ADSs caused by the injected faults. We evaluate FADE on Baidu Apollo, a representative and practical industrial ADS. The evaluation results demonstrate the practical values of FADE, and disclose some useful findings. We further conduct physical experiments using a Baidu Apollo 6.0 EDU AV to validate these findings in real-world settings.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext af23c9c7-9809-42d7-beb4-94b03ab1c7e2Builds on13
- Adversarial Sensor Attack on LiDAR-based Perception in Autonomous DrivingYulong Cao, Chaowei Xiao, Benjamin Cyr, Yimeng Zhou et al.CCS 2019 · 626 citations
- Invisible for both Camera and LiDAR: Security of Multi-Sensor Fusion based Perception in Autonomous Driving Under Physical-World AttacksYulong Cao, Ningfei Wang, Chaowei Xiao, Dawei Yang et al.S&P 2021 · 309 citations
- MOSAT: finding safety violations of autonomous driving systems using multi-objective genetic algorithmHaoxiang Tian, Yan Jiang, Guoquan Wu, Jiren Yan et al.FSE 2022 · 74 citations
- Fooling LiDAR Perception via Adversarial Trajectory PerturbationYiming Li, Congcong Wen, Felix Juefei-Xu, Chen FengICCV 2021 · 69 citations
- Can We Use Arbitrary Objects to Attack LiDAR Perception in Autonomous Driving?Yi Zhu, Chenglin Miao, Tianhang Zheng, Foad Hajiaghajani et al.CCS 2021 · 65 citations
Related papers
- Fusion Is Not Enough: Single Modal Attacks on Fusion Models for 3D Object DetectionZhiyuan Cheng, Hongjun Choi, Shiwei Feng, James Chenhao Liang et al.ICLR 2024 · 32 citations
- Malicious Attacks against Multi-Sensor Fusion in Autonomous DrivingYi Zhu, Chenglin Miao, Hongfei Xue, Yunnan Yu et al.MobiCom 2024 · 28 citations
- Unity is Strength? Benchmarking the Robustness of Fusion-based 3D Object Detection against Physical Sensor AttackZizhi Jin, Xuancun Lu, Bo Yang, Yushi Cheng et al.WWW 2024 · 7 citations
- Generating Realistic and Diverse Tests for LiDAR-Based Perception SystemsGarrett Christian, Trey Woodlief, Sebastian G. ElbaumICSE 2023 · 11 citations
- Detecting multi-sensor fusion errors in advanced driver-assistance systemsZiyuan Zhong, Zhisheng Hu, Shengjian Guo, Xinyang Zhang et al.ISSTA 2022 · 28 citations
