Generating Realistic and Diverse Tests for LiDAR-Based Perception Systems
Garrett Christian, Trey Woodlief, Sebastian G. Elbaum
Abstract
Autonomous systems rely on a perception component to interpret their surroundings, and when misinterpretations occur, they can and have led to serious and fatal system-level failures. Yet, existing methods for testing perception software remain limited in both their capacity to efficiently generate test data that translates to real-world performance and in their diversity to capture the long tail of rare but safety-critical scenarios. These limitations are particularly evident for perception systems based on LiDAR sensors, which have emerged as a crucial component in modern autonomous systems due to their ability to provide a 3D scan of the world and operate in all lighting conditions. To address these limitations, we introduce a novel approach for testing LiDAR-based perception systems by leveraging existing real-world data as a basis to generate realistic and diverse test cases through mutations that preserve realism invariants while generating inputs rarely found in existing data sets, and automatically crafting oracles that identify potentially safety-critical issues in perception performance. We implemented our approach to assess its ability to identify perception failures, generating over 50,000 test inputs for five state-of-the-art LiDAR-based perception systems. We found that it efficiently generated test cases that yield errors in perception that could result in real consequences if these systems were deployed and does so at a low rate of false positives.
Ask about this paper
Ask your agent about it.
Lune has read the top-tier papers around this one, so every answer names the papers it rests on.
Your agent calls
Lunesearch_papers
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers get 9fc75af7-32fd-40c5-9f51-d1b1676c1e5dCited by top-tier papers6
- MultiTest: Physical-Aware Object Insertion for Testing Multi-sensor Fusion Perception SystemsXinyu Gao, Zhijie Wang, Yang Feng, Lei Ma et al.ICSE 2024 · 14 citations
- CooTest: An Automated Testing Approach for V2X Communication SystemsAn Guo, Xinyu Gao, Zhenyu Chen, Yuan Xiao et al.ISSTA 2024 · 4 citations
- Testing the Fault-Tolerance of Multi-sensor Fusion Perception in Autonomous Driving SystemsHaoxiang Tian, Wenqiang Ding, Xingshuo Han, Guoquan Wu et al.ISSTA 2025 · 2 citations
- When Autonomous Vehicle Meets V2X Cooperative Perception: How Far Are We?An Guo, Shuoxiao Zhang, Enyi Tang, Xinyu Gao et al.ASE 2025 · 1 citation
- A Differential Testing Framework to Identify Critical AV Failures Leveraging Arbitrary InputsTrey Woodlief, Carl Hildebrandt, Sebastian G. ElbaumICSE 2025 · 1 citation
Related papers
- AdvSim: Generating Safety-Critical Scenarios for Self-Driving VehiclesJingkang Wang, Ava Pun, James Tu, Sivabalan Manivasagam et al.CVPR 2021
- Semantic Image Fuzzing of AI Perception SystemsTrey Woodlief, Sebastian G. Elbaum, Kevin SullivanICSE 2022 · 17 citations
- ADPerf: Investigating and Testing Performance in Autonomous Driving SystemsTri Minh-Triet Pham, Diego Elias Costa, Weiyi Shang, Jinqiu YangASE 2025
- Physically Realizable Adversarial Examples for LiDAR Object DetectionJames Tu, Mengye Ren, Sivabalan Manivasagam, Ming Liang et al.CVPR 2020
- MoDitector: Module-Directed Testing for Autonomous Driving SystemsRenzhi Wang, Mingfei Cheng, Xiaofei Xie, Yuan Zhou et al.ISSTA 2025 · 3 citations
