Simulation-Based Validation for Autonomous Driving Systems
Changwen Li, Joseph Sifakis, Qiang Wang, Rongjie Yan, Jian Zhang
Abstract
Simulation is essential to validate autonomous driving systems. However, a simple simulation, even for an extremely high number of simulated miles or hours, is not sufficient. We need well-founded criteria showing that simulation does indeed cover a large fraction of the relevant real-world situations. In addition, the validation must concern not only incidents, but also the detection of any type of potentially dangerous situation, such as traffic violations. We investigate a rigorous simulation and testing-based validation method for autonomous driving systems that integrates an existing industrial simulator and a formally defined testing environment. The environment includes a scenario generator that drives the simulation process and a monitor that checks at runtime the observed behavior of the system against a set of system properties to be validated. The validation method consists in extracting from the simulator a semantic model of the simulated system including a metric graph, which is a mathematical model of the environment in which the vehicles of the system evolve. The monitor can verify properties formalized in a first-order linear temporal logic and provide diagnostics explaining their non satisfaction. Instead of exploring the system behavior randomly as many simulators do, we propose a method to systematically generate sets of scenarios that cover potentially risky situations, especially for different types of junctions where specific traffic rules must be respected. We show that the systematic exploration of risky situations has uncovered many flaws in the real simulator that would have been very difficult to discover by a random exploration process.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 98e93282-246e-4928-8436-d5e986cf9c1cCited by top-tier papers3
- DiaVio: LLM-Empowered Diagnosis of Safety Violations in ADS Simulation TestingYou Lu, Yifan Tian, Yuyang Bi, Bihuan Chen et al.ISSTA 2024 · 9 citations
- VioHawk: Detecting Traffic Violations of Autonomous Driving Systems through Criticality-Guided Simulation TestingZhongrui Li, Jiarun Dai, Zongan Huang, Nianhao You et al.ISSTA 2024 · 7 citations
- On-Demand Scenario Generation for Testing Automated Driving SystemsSongyang Yan, Xiaodong Zhang, Kunkun Hao, Haojie Xin et al.FSE 2025 · 6 citations
Builds on2
- Testing of autonomous driving systems: where are we and where should we go?Guannan Lou, Yao Deng, Xi Zheng, Mengshi Zhang et al.FSE 2022 · 85 citations
- MOSAT: finding safety violations of autonomous driving systems using multi-objective genetic algorithmHaoxiang Tian, Yan Jiang, Guoquan Wu, Jiren Yan et al.FSE 2022 · 74 citations
Related papers
- Scene Flow Specifications: Encoding and Monitoring Rich Temporal Safety Properties of Autonomous SystemsTrey Woodlief, Felipe Toledo, Matthew B. Dwyer, Sebastian G. ElbaumFSE 2025 · 2 citations
- REDriver: Runtime Enforcement for Autonomous VehiclesYang Sun, Christopher M. Poskitt, Xiaodong Zhang, Jun SunICSE 2024 · 5 citations
- Poirot: Automatic Root Cause Analysis of Safety Violations in ADS Simulation Testing via Hypothetical ReasoningYou Lu, Dingji Wang, Kun Zhang, Bihuan Chen et al.ISSTA 2026
- Traffic Scenario Logic: A Spatial-Temporal Logic for Modeling and Reasoning of Urban Traffic ScenariosRuolin Wang, Yuejiao Xu, Jianmin JiAAAI 2025 · 2 citations
- Prunario: Testing Autonomous Driving Systems by Pruning Likely Redundant ScenariosMinsu Kim, Sunbeom So, Hakjoo OhOOPSLA 2026
