On-Demand Scenario Generation for Testing Automated Driving Systems
Songyang Yan, Xiaodong Zhang, Kunkun Hao, Haojie Xin, Yonggang Luo, Jucheng Yang, Ming Fan, Chao Yang, Jun Sun, Zijiang Yang
Abstract
The safety and reliability of Automated Driving Systems (ADS) are paramount, necessitating rigorous testing methodologies to uncover potential failures before deployment. Traditional testing approaches often prioritize either natural scenario sampling or safety-critical scenario generation, resulting in overly simplistic or unrealistic hazardous tests. In practice, the demand for natural scenarios (e.g., when evaluating the ADS's reliability in real-world conditions), critical scenarios (e.g., when evaluating safety in critical situations), or somewhere in between (e.g., when testing the ADS in regions with less civilized drivers) varies depending on the testing objectives. To address this issue, we propose the On-demand Scenario Generation (OSG) Framework, which generates diverse scenarios with varying risk levels. Achieving the goal of OSG is challenging due to the complexity of quantifying the criticalness and naturalness stemming from intricate vehicle-environment interactions, as well as the need to maintain scenario diversity across various risk levels. OSG learns from real-world traffic datasets and employs a Risk Intensity Regulator to quantitatively control the risk level. It also leverages an improved heuristic search method to ensure scenario diversity. We evaluate OSG on the Carla simulators using various ADSs. We verify OSG's ability to generate scenarios with different risk levels and demonstrate its necessity by comparing accident types across risk levels. With the help of OSG, we are now able to systematically and objectively compare the performance of different ADSs based on different risk levels.
CCS Concepts: • Software and its engineering → Software testing and debugging.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Builds on24
- Invisible for both Camera and LiDAR: Security of Multi-Sensor Fusion based Perception in Autonomous Driving Under Physical-World AttacksYulong Cao, Ningfei Wang, Chaowei Xiao, Dawei Yang et al.S&P 2021 · 309 citations
- Hidden Biases of End-to-End Driving ModelsBernhard Jaeger, Kashyap Chitta, Andreas GeigerICCV 2023 · 130 citations
- Generating Useful Accident-Prone Driving Scenarios via a Learned Traffic PriorDavis Rempe, Jonah Philion, Leonidas J. Guibas, Sanja Fidler et al.CVPR 2022 · 123 citations
- Testing of autonomous driving systems: where are we and where should we go?Guannan Lou, Yao Deng, Xi Zheng, Mengshi Zhang et al.FSE 2022 · 85 citations
- Efficient Online Testing for DNN-Enabled Systems using Surrogate-Assisted and Many-Objective OptimizationFitash Ul Haq, Donghwan Shin, Lionel C. BriandICSE 2022 · 77 citations
Related papers
- SoVAR: Build Generalizable Scenarios from Accident Reports for Autonomous Driving TestingAn Guo, Yuan Zhou, Haoxiang Tian, Chunrong Fang et al.ASE 2024 · 12 citations
- From Particles to Perils: SVGD-Based Hazardous Scenario Generation for Autonomous Driving Systems TestingLinfeng Liang, Xiao Cheng, Tsong Yueh Chen, Xi ZhengFSE 2026
- Generating Critical Test Scenarios for Autonomous Driving Systems via Influential Behavior PatternsHaoxiang Tian, Guoquan Wu, Jiren Yan, Yan Jiang et al.ASE 2022 · 24 citations
- Multi-modal Traffic Scenario Generation for Autonomous Driving System TestingZhi Tu, Liangkun Niu, Wei Fan, Tianyi ZhangFSE 2025 · 1 citation
- Any2Critical: Safety-Critical Scenario Generation from Arbitrary Real-World Driving ContextsYao Huang, Yubo Chen, Ruochen Zhang, Yitong Sun et al.AAAI 2026
