VioHawk: Detecting Traffic Violations of Autonomous Driving Systems through Criticality-Guided Simulation Testing
Zhongrui Li, Jiarun Dai, Zongan Huang, Nianhao You, Yuan Zhang, Min Yang
Abstract
As highlighted in authoritative standards (e.g., ISO21448), traffic law compliance is a fundamental prerequisite for the commercialization of autonomous driving systems (ADS). Hence, manufacturers are in severe need of techniques to detect harsh driving situations in which the target ADS would violate traffic laws. To achieve this goal, existing works commonly resort to searching-based simulation testing, which continuously adjusts the scenario configurations (e.g., add new vehicles) of initial simulation scenarios and hunts for critical scenarios. Specifically, they apply pre-defined heuristics on each mutated scenario to approximate the likelihood of triggering ADS traffic violations, and accordingly perform searching scheduling. However, with those comparably more critical scenarios in hand, they fail to offer deterministic guidance on which and how scenario configurations should be further mutated to reliably trigger the target ADS misbehaviors. Hence, they inevitably suffer from meaningless efforts to traverse the huge scenario search space. In this work, we propose VioHawk, a novel simulation-based fuzzer that hunts for scenarios that imply ADS traffic violations. Our key idea is that, traffic law regulations can be formally modeled as hazardous/non-hazardous driving areas on the map at each timestamp during ADS simulation testing (e.g., when the traffic light is red, the intersection is marked as hazardous areas). Following this idea, VioHawk works by inducing the autonomous vehicle to drive into the law-specified hazardous areas with deterministic mutation operations. We evaluated the effectiveness of VioHawk in testing industry-grade ADS (i.e., Apollo). We constructed a benchmark dataset that contains 42 ADS violation scenarios against real-world traffic laws. Compared to existing tools, VioHawk can reproduce 3.1X 13.3X more violations within the same time budget, and save 1.6X 8.9X the reproduction time for those identified violations. Finally, with the help of VioHawk, we identified 9+8 previously unknown violations of real-world traffic laws on Apollo 7.0/8.0.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext cf6797ac-4e4d-4db8-9156-93b6ba94c0b5Builds on18
- Flow Network based Generative Models for Non-Iterative Diverse Candidate GenerationEmmanuel Bengio, Moksh Jain, Maksym Korablyov, Doina Precup et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 565 citations
- Invisible for both Camera and LiDAR: Security of Multi-Sensor Fusion based Perception in Autonomous Driving Under Physical-World AttacksYulong Cao, Ningfei Wang, Chaowei Xiao, Dawei Yang et al.S&P 2021 · 309 citations
- Model-based exploration of the frontier of behaviours for deep learning system testingVincenzo Riccio, Paolo TonellaFSE 2020 · 134 citations
- Efficient Online Testing for DNN-Enabled Systems using Surrogate-Assisted and Many-Objective OptimizationFitash Ul Haq, Donghwan Shin, Lionel C. BriandICSE 2022 · 77 citations
- DeepHyperion: exploring the feature space of deep learning-based systems through illumination searchTahereh Zohdinasab, Vincenzo Riccio, Alessio Gambi, Paolo TonellaISSTA 2021 · 76 citations
Related papers
- LawBreaker: An Approach for Specifying Traffic Laws and Fuzzing Autonomous VehiclesYang Sun, Christopher M. Poskitt, Jun Sun, Yuqi Chen et al.ASE 2022 · 46 citations
- MOSAT: finding safety violations of autonomous driving systems using multi-objective genetic algorithmHaoxiang Tian, Yan Jiang, Guoquan Wu, Jiren Yan et al.FSE 2022 · 74 citations
- Testing Automated Driving Systems by Breaking Many Laws EfficientlyXiaodong Zhang, Wei Zhao, Yang Sun, Jun Sun et al.ISSTA 2023 · 22 citations
- SCTrans: Constructing a Large Public Scenario Dataset for Simulation Testing of Autonomous Driving SystemsJiarun Dai, Bufan Gao, Mingyuan Luo, Zongan Huang et al.ICSE 2024 · 8 citations
- Generating Critical Test Scenarios for Autonomous Driving Systems via Influential Behavior PatternsHaoxiang Tian, Guoquan Wu, Jiren Yan, Yan Jiang et al.ASE 2022 · 24 citations
