When Fair Ranking Meets Uncertain Inference
Avijit Ghosh, Ritam Dutt, Christo Wilson
Abstract
Existing fair ranking systems, especially those designed to be demographically fair, assume that accurate demographic information about individuals is available to the ranking algorithm. In practice, however, this assumption may not hold -in real-world contexts like ranking job applicants or credit seekers, social and legal barriers may prevent algorithm operators from collecting peoples' demographic information. In these cases, algorithm operators may attempt to infer peoples' demographics and then supply these inferences as inputs to the ranking algorithm.
In this study, we investigate how uncertainty and errors in demographic inference impact the fairness offered by fair ranking algorithms. Using simulations and three case studies with real datasets, we show how demographic inferences drawn from real systems can lead to unfair rankings. Our results suggest that developers should not use inferred demographic data as input to fair ranking algorithms, unless the inferences are extremely accurate.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 868ba635-0496-4c75-b0c2-d460540df0ccCited by top-tier papers3
- Fairness in Ranking under UncertaintyAshudeep Singh, David Kempe, Thorsten JoachimsNeurIPS 2021 · 62 citations
- Fair Ranking with Noisy Protected AttributesAnay Mehrotra, Nisheeth K. VishnoiNeurIPS 2022 · 24 citations
- Fairness in Matching under UncertaintySiddartha Devic, David Kempe, Vatsal Sharan, Aleksandra KorolovaICML 2023 · 8 citations
Builds on4
- Measuring Misinformation in Video Search Platforms: An Audit Study on YouTubeEslam Hussein, Prerna Juneja, Tanushree MitraCSCW 2020 · 233 citations
- Controlling Fairness and Bias in Dynamic Learning-to-RankMarco Morik, Ashudeep Singh, Jessica Hong, Thorsten JoachimsSIGIR 2020 · 205 citations
- Fair Classification with Noisy Protected Attributes: A Framework with Provable GuaranteesL. Elisa Celis, Lingxiao Huang, Vijay Keswani, Nisheeth K. VishnoiICML 2021 · 67 citations
- Implicit Diversity in Image SummarizationL. Elisa Celis, Vijay KeswaniCSCW 2020 · 26 citations
Related papers
- Rank Aggregation Algorithms for Fair ConsensusCaitlin Kuhlman, Elke A. RundensteinerVLDB 2020 · 60 citations
- Fairness Guarantees under Demographic ShiftStephen Giguere, Blossom Metevier, Bruno Castro da Silva, Yuriy Brun et al.ICLR 2022 · 57 citations
- Estimation of Fair Ranking Metrics with Incomplete JudgmentsÖmer Kirnap, Fernando Diaz, Asia Biega, Michael D. Ekstrand et al.WWW 2021 · 40 citations
- Group Meritocratic Fairness in Linear Contextual BanditsRiccardo Grazzi, Arya Akhavan, John Isak Texas Falk, Leonardo Cella et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 12 citations
- On the Problem of Underranking in Group-Fair RankingSruthi Gorantla, Amit Deshpande, Anand LouisICML 2021 · 26 citations
