Measuring Misinformation in Video Search Platforms: An Audit Study on YouTube
Eslam Hussein, Prerna Juneja, Tanushree Mitra
Abstract
Search engines are the primary gateways of information. Yet, they do not take into account the credibility of search results. There is a growing concern that YouTube, the second largest search engine and the most popular video-sharing platform, has been promoting and recommending misinformative content for certain search topics. In this study, we audit YouTube to verify those claims. Our audit experiments investigate whether personalization (based on age, gender, geolocation, or watch history) contributes to amplifying misinformation. After shortlisting five popular topics known to contain misinformative content and compiling associated search queries representing them, we conduct two sets of audits-Search-and Watch-misinformative audits. Our audits resulted in a dataset of more than 56K videos compiled to link stance (whether promoting misinformation or not) with the personalization attribute audited. Our videos correspond to three major YouTube components: search results, Up-Next, and Top 5 recommendations. We find that demographics, such as, gender, age, and geolocation do not have a significant effect on amplifying misinformation in returned search results for users with brand new accounts. On the other hand, once a user develops a watch history, these attributes do affect the extent of misinformation recommended to them. Further analyses reveal a filter bubble effect, both in the Top 5 and Up-Next recommendations for all topics, except vaccine controversies; for these topics, watching videos that promote misinformation leads to more misinformative video recommendations. In conclusion, YouTube still has a long way to go to mitigate misinformation on its platform.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext d1d15ca9-2f04-4b89-91f9-46a353132a83Cited by top-tier papers40
- Problematic Machine Behavior: A Systematic Literature Review of Algorithm AuditsJack BandyCSCW 2021 · 190 citations
- An Empirical Investigation of Personalization Factors on TikTokMaximilian Boeker, Aleksandra UrmanWWW 2022 · 112 citations
- "How over is it?" Understanding the Incel Community on YouTubeKostantinos Papadamou, Savvas Zannettou, Jeremy Blackburn, Emiliano De Cristofaro et al.CSCW 2021 · 77 citations
- A Literature Review of Video-Sharing Platform Research in HCIAva Bartolome, Shuo NiuCHI 2023 · 63 citations
- Debate Chatbots to Facilitate Critical Thinking on YouTube: Social Identity and Conversational Style Make A DifferenceThitaree Tanprasert, Sidney S. Fels, Luanne Sinnamon, Dongwook YoonCHI 2024 · 51 citations
Related papers
- Auditing E-Commerce Platforms for Algorithmically Curated Vaccine MisinformationPrerna Juneja, Tanushree MitraCHI 2021 · 35 citations
- Assessing enactment of content regulation policies: A post hoc crowd-sourced audit of election misinformation on YouTubePrerna Juneja, Md Momen Bhuiyan, Tanushree MitraCHI 2023 · 33 citations
- YouTube Recommendations and Effects on Sharing Across Online Social PlatformsCody Buntain, Richard Bonneau, Jonathan Nagler, Joshua A. TuckerCSCW 2021 · 42 citations
- Deradicalizing YouTube: Characterization, Detection, and Personalization of Religiously Intolerant Arabic VideosNuha Albadi, Maram Kurdi, Shivakant MishraCSCW 2022 · 24 citations
- Combating Online Misinformation Videos: Characterization, Detection, and Future DirectionsYuyan Bu, Qiang Sheng, Juan Cao, Peng Qi et al.ACM MM 2023 · 38 citations
