An Empirical Investigation of Personalization Factors on TikTok
Maximilian Boeker, Aleksandra Urman
Abstract
TikTok currently is the fastest growing social media platform with over 1 billion active monthly users of which the majority is from generation Z. Arguably, its most important success driver is its recommendation system. Despite the importance of TikTok’s algorithm to the platform’s success and content distribution, little work has been done on the empirical analysis of the algorithm. Our work lays the foundation to fill this research gap. Using a sock-puppet audit methodology with a custom algorithm developed by us, we tested and analysed the effect of the language and location used to access TikTok, follow- and like-feature, as well as how the recommended content changes as a user watches certain posts longer than others. We provide evidence that all the tested factors influence the content recommended to TikTok users. Further, we identified that the follow-feature has the strongest influence, followed by the like-feature and video view rate. We also discuss the implications of our findings in the context of the formation of filter bubbles on TikTok and the proliferation of problematic content.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext ec37e262-04fd-4cd5-a5a1-bb50985b2a1dCited by top-tier papers10
- Analyzing User Engagement with TikTok's Short Format Video Recommendations using Data DonationsSavvas Zannettou, Olivia Nemes Nemeth, Oshrat Ayalon, Angelica Goetzen et al.CHI 2024 · 70 citations
- TikTok and the Art of Personalization: Investigating Exploration and Exploitation on Social Media FeedsKaran Vombatkere, Sepehr Mousavi, Savvas Zannettou, Franziska Roesner et al.WWW 2024 · 45 citations
- Sharenting on TikTok: Exploring Parental Sharing Behaviors and the Discourse Around Children's Online PrivacySophie Stephenson, Christopher Nathaniel Page, Miranda Wei, Apu Kapadia et al.CHI 2024 · 19 citations
- Marginalization and the Construction of Mental Illness Narratives Online: Foregrounding Institutions in Technology-Mediated CareSachin R. Pendse, Neha Kumar, Munmun De ChoudhuryCSCW 2023 · 18 citations
- Children, Parents, and Misinformation on Social MediaFilipo Sharevski, Jennifer Vander LoopS&P 2024 · 9 citations
Builds on4
- Measuring Misinformation in Video Search Platforms: An Audit Study on YouTubeEslam Hussein, Prerna Juneja, Tanushree MitraCSCW 2020 · 233 citations
- Problematic Machine Behavior: A Systematic Literature Review of Algorithm AuditsJack BandyCSCW 2021 · 190 citations
- More Accounts, Fewer Links: How Algorithmic Curation Impacts Media Exposure in Twitter TimelinesJack Bandy, Nicholas DiakopoulosCSCW 2021 · 54 citations
- Middle-Aged Video Consumers' Beliefs About Algorithmic Recommendations on YouTubeOscar Alvarado, Hendrik Heuer, Vero Vanden Abeele, Andreas Breiter et al.CSCW 2020 · 48 citations
Related papers
- "They've Over-Emphasized That One Search": Controlling Unwanted Content on TikTok's For You PageJulie A. Vera, Sourojit GhoshCHI 2025 · 3 citations
- Learning AI Auditing: A Case Study of Teenagers Auditing a Generative AI ModelLuis Morales-Navarro, Michelle A. Gan, Evelyn Yu, Lauren Vogelstein et al.CSCW 2025 · 6 citations
- Counting How the Seconds Count: Understanding TikTok Behavior via ML-driven Analysis of Video ContentMaleeha Masood, Shreya Kannan, Zikun Liu, Deepak Vasisht et al.CHI 2026 · 2 citations
- Not Just 'For You': How the Algorithmic Crystal Mediates Communication and Identity Work on TikTok's FYPZoë Natalia Cullen, Angela Y. Lee, Brenna M. Davidson, Jeffrey T. Hancock et al.CSCW 2025 · 2 citations
- "We're not all construction workers": Algorithmic Compression of Latinidad on TikTokNina Lutz, Cecilia R. AragonCSCW 2024 · 9 citations
