Lune

EMNLP Findings2025

Tracing Multilingual Factual Knowledge Acquisition in Pretraining

Yihong Liu, Mingyang Wang, Amir Hossein Kargaran, Felicia Körner, Ercong Nie, Barbara Plank, François Yvon, Hinrich Schütze

Abstract

Large Language Models (LLMs) are capable of recalling multilingual factual knowledge present in their pretraining data. However, most studies evaluate only the final model, leaving the development of factual recall and crosslingual consistency throughout pretraining largely unexplored. In this work, we trace how factual recall and crosslingual consistency evolve during pretraining, focusing on OLMo-7B as a case study. We find that both accuracy and consistency improve over time for most languages. We show that this improvement is primarily driven by the fact frequency in the pretraining corpus: more frequent facts are more likely to be recalled correctly, regardless of language. Yet, some low-frequency facts in non-English languages can still be correctly recalled. Our analysis reveals that these instances largely benefit from crosslingual transfer of their English counterparts -an effect that emerges predominantly in the early stages of pretraining. We pinpoint two distinct pathways through which multilingual factual knowledge acquisition occurs: (1) frequency-driven learning, which is dominant and language-agnostic, and (2) crosslingual transfer, which is limited in scale and typically constrained to relation types involving named entities. We release our code and data to facilitate further research at https://github. com/cisnlp/multilingual-fact-tracing.

Ask Lune

Ask anything. The answer quotes the paper.

Lune reads all of it and the papers around it, then shows you the passages behind every answer.

Questions to start from

Lune answers from

the full paper · related work

Get the answer

Free to start. No credit card required.

Builds on12

  1. How Do Large Language Models Acquire Factual Knowledge During Pretraining?Hoyeon Chang, Jinho Park, Seonghyeon Ye, Sohee Yang et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 124 citations
  2. Sudden Drops in the Loss: Syntax Acquisition, Phase Transitions, and Simplicity Bias in MLMsAngelica Chen, Ravid Shwartz-Ziv, Kyunghyun Cho, Matthew L. Leavitt et al.ICLR 2024 · 119 citations
  3. Impact of Pretraining Term Frequencies on Few-Shot Numerical ReasoningYasaman Razeghi, Robert L. Logan IV, Matt Gardner, Sameer SinghEMNLP Findings 2022 · 89 citations
  4. Analyzing the Mono- and Cross-Lingual Pretraining Dynamics of Multilingual Language ModelsTerra Blevins, Hila Gonen, Luke ZettlemoyerEMNLP 2022 · 13 citations
  5. Probing the Emergence of Cross-lingual Alignment during LLM TrainingHetong Wang, Pasquale Minervini, Edoardo M. PontiACL Findings 2024 · 13 citations

Related papers

  1. Cross-Lingual Consistency of Factual Knowledge in Multilingual Language ModelsJirui Qi, Raquel Fernández, Arianna BisazzaEMNLP 2023 · 9 citations
  2. Time Course MechInterp: Analyzing the Evolution of Components and Knowledge in Large Language ModelsAhmad Dawar Hakimi, Ali Modarressi, Philipp Wicke, Hinrich SchützeACL Findings 2025
  3. Bridging the Language Gap: Uncovering and Aligning Shared Circuits for Multi-Hop Reasoning in Multilingual LLMsChenghao Sun, Zhen Huang, Yonggang Zhang, Xinmei Tian et al.AAAI 2026
  4. Paths Not Taken: Understanding and Mending the Multilingual Factual Recall PipelineMeng Lu, Ruochen Zhang, Carsten Eickhoff, Ellie PavlickEMNLP 2025 · 15 citations
  5. Understanding Data Temporality Impact on Large Language Models Pre-trainingRomain Fabre, Hippolyte Pilchen, Franck SIGNE TALLA, Patrick Perez et al.ICML 2026
Dusk over the sea between two cliffs drawn in fine vertical lines