Understanding Data Temporality Impact on Large Language Models Pre-training
Romain Fabre, Hippolyte Pilchen, Franck SIGNE TALLA, Patrick Perez, Edouard Grave
Abstract
Large language models (LLMs) are typically trained on shuffled corpora, yielding models whose knowledge is frozen at training time and whose temporal grounding remains poorly understood. In this work, we study the impact of pretraining dynamics on the acquisition of time-sensitive factual knowledge, focusing specifically on data ordering. Our main contributions are twofold. First, we introduce a comprehensive benchmark of over 7,000 temporally grounded questions and an evaluation protocol that enables analysis of whether models correctly associate facts with their corresponding time periods. Second, we pretrain 6B-parameter language models on temporally ordered Common Crawl snapshots and compare them against standard shuffled pretraining. Our results show that sequentially trained models match shuffled baselines on general language understanding and common knowledge while consistently exhibiting more up-to-date and temporally precise knowledge. Temporally ordered pretraining yields improved factual freshness, while shuffled pretraining peaks on older data, possibly due to increased factual repetition. These findings, along with the release of our checkpoints and datasets, provide a foundation for future research on continual learning for large language models.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext d13a16ed-292c-4b3f-b4e5-8b53a3e8cdfdBuilds on5
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- Measuring Massive Multitask Language UnderstandingDan Hendrycks, Collin Burns, Steven Basart, Andy Zou et al.ICLR 2021 · 7,905 citations
- Deduplicating Training Data Makes Language Models BetterKatherine Lee, Daphne Ippolito, Andrew Nystrom, Chiyuan Zhang et al.ACL 2022 · 844 citations
- Data Mixing Can Induce Phase Transitions in Knowledge AcquisitionXinran Gu, Kaifeng Lyu, Jiazheng Li, Jingzhao ZhangNeurIPS 2025 · 16 citations
- TiC-LM: A Web-Scale Benchmark for Time-Continual LLM PretrainingJeffrey Li, Mohammadreza Armandpour, Iman Mirzadeh, Sachin Mehta et al.ACL 2025
Related papers
- How Do Large Language Models Acquire Factual Knowledge During Pretraining?Hoyeon Chang, Jinho Park, Seonghyeon Ye, Sohee Yang et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 124 citations
- TemporalWiki: A Lifelong Benchmark for Training and Evaluating Ever-Evolving Language ModelsJoel Jang, Seonghyeon Ye, Changho Lee, Sohee Yang et al.EMNLP 2022 · 42 citations
- Harnessing Temporal Databases for Systematic Evaluation of Factual Time-Sensitive Question-Answering in LLMsSoyeon Kim, Jindong Wang, Xing Xie, Steven Euijong WhangICLR 2026
- Towards Continual Knowledge Learning of Language ModelsJoel Jang, Seonghyeon Ye, Sohee Yang, Joongbo Shin et al.ICLR 2022 · 204 citations
- ChroKnowledge: Unveiling Chronological Knowledge of Language Models in Multiple DomainsYein Park, Chanwoong Yoon, Jungwoo Park, Donghyeon Lee et al.ICLR 2025
