Lune

ACL Findings2026

RAG or Learning? Understanding the Limits of LLM Adaptation under Continuous Knowledge Drift in the Real World

Hanbing Liu, Lang Cao, Yang Li

Abstract

Large language models (LLMs) acquire most of their knowledge during pretraining, which ties them to a fixed snapshot of the world and makes adaptation to continuously evolving knowledge challenging. As facts, entities, and events change over time, models may experience continuous knowledge drift, resulting not only in outdated predictions but also in temporally inconsistent reasoning. Although existing approaches, such as continual finetuning, knowledge editing, and retrieval-augmented generation (RAG), aim to update or supplement model knowledge, they are rarely evaluated in settings that reflect chronological, evolving, and realworld knowledge evolution. In this work, we introduce a new benchmark of real-world dynamic events, constructed from time-stamped evidence that captures how knowledge evolves over time, which enables systematic evaluation of model adaptation under continuous knowledge drift. The benchmark reveals that most existing methods, including vanilla RAG and several learning-based approaches, struggle under this setting, exposing critical limitations such as catastrophic forgetting and temporal inconsistency. To mitigate these limitations, we propose a time-aware retrieval baseline, Chronos, which progressively organizes retrieved evidence into an Event Evolution Graph to enable more temporally consistent understanding in LLMs without additional training. Overall, this work provides a foundation for analyzing and advancing LLM adaptation to continuous knowledge drift in realistic settings. Code is available at https://github.com/hbing-l/chronos.

Ask Lune

Ask anything. The answer quotes the paper.

Lune reads all of it and the papers around it, then shows you the passages behind every answer.

Questions to start from

Lune answers from

the full paper · related work

Get the answer

Free to start. No credit card required.

Builds on22

  1. TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human FalsehoodsStephanie Lin, Jacob Hilton, Owain EvansACL 2022 · 3,228 citations
  2. Fast Model Editing at ScaleEric Mitchell, Charles Lin, Antoine Bosselut, Chelsea Finn et al.ICLR 2022 · 527 citations
  3. HippoRAG: Neurobiologically Inspired Long-Term Memory for Large Language ModelsBernal Jimenez Gutierrez, Yiheng Shu, Yu Gu, Michihiro Yasunaga et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 395 citations
  4. RankRAG: Unifying Context Ranking with Retrieval-Augmented Generation in LLMsYue Yu, Wei Ping, Zihan Liu, Boxin Wang et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 321 citations
  5. PMET: Precise Model Editing in a TransformerXiaopeng Li, Shasha Li, Shezheng Song, Jing Yang et al.AAAI 2024 · 208 citations

Related papers

  1. ChronoBias: A Benchmark for Evaluating Temporal Group Bias in the Time-sensitive Knowledge of Large Language ModelsKyungmin Kim, Youngbin Choi, Hyounghun Kim, Dongwoo Kim et al.EMNLP Findings 2025
  2. Towards Continual Knowledge Learning of Language ModelsJoel Jang, Seonghyeon Ye, Sohee Yang, Joongbo Shin et al.ICLR 2022 · 204 citations
  3. When Facts Change: Temporal Knowledge Conflict Resolution in LLMsJonas Wallat, Wolfgang Nejdl, Sandipan SikdarACL Findings 2026
  4. T-GRAG: A Dynamic GraphRAG Framework for Resolving Temporal Conflicts and Redundancy in Knowledge RetrievalDong Li, Yichen Niu, Ying Ai, Xiang Zou et al.ACM MM 2025 · 11 citations
  5. Beyond Single Pass, Looping Through Time: KG-IRAG with Iterative Knowledge RetrievalRuiyi Yang, Hao Xue, Imran Razzak, Flora D. SalimWWW 2026 · 8 citations
Dusk over the sea between two cliffs drawn in fine vertical lines