Lune

EMNLP Findings2025

ChronoBias: A Benchmark for Evaluating Temporal Group Bias in the Time-sensitive Knowledge of Large Language Models

Kyungmin Kim, Youngbin Choi, Hyounghun Kim, Dongwoo Kim, Sangdon Park

Abstract

In this paper, we propose ChronoBias, a novel benchmark for evaluating time-conditional group bias in the time-sensitive knowledge of large language models (LLMs). Our benchmark is constructed via a template-based semiautomated generation method, balancing the quality-quantity trade-off in existing benchmark curation approaches. For knowledge that changes over time, time-conditional group bias exhibits varying patterns across time intervals, evident in both the best-and worst-performing groups and in the bias metric itself. In addition to parametric knowledge bias-which influences group bias across all time intervalswe identify time-sensitivity bias as an additional factor after a model's knowledge cutoff, accounting for much of the variation in timeconditional group bias over time. Since both biases are irreducible, retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) can be a promising approach, as it can address post-cutoff knowledge and better leverage pretraining knowledge that is underrepresented in the model parameters. While RAG improves both overall performance and group bias, we observe that the disparate patterns of time-conditional group bias still persist. Therefore, through extensive experiments with various model configurations, we illustrate how accurate and fair RAG-based LLMs should behave and provide actionable guidelines toward constructing such ideal models.

Ask Lune

Ask anything. The answer quotes the paper.

Lune reads all of it and the papers around it, then shows you the passages behind every answer.

Questions to start from

Lune answers from

the full paper · related work

Get the answer

Free to start. No credit card required.

Builds on12

  1. Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP TasksPatrick Lewis, Ethan Perez, Aleksandra Piktus, Fabio Petroni et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 19,162 citations
  2. Self-RAG: Learning to Retrieve, Generate, and Critique through Self-ReflectionAkari Asai, Zeqiu Wu, Yizhong Wang, Avirup Sil et al.ICLR 2024 · 1,798 citations
  3. Adaptive Chameleon or Stubborn Sloth: Revealing the Behavior of Large Language Models in Knowledge ConflictsJian Xie, Kai Zhang, Jiangjie Chen, Renze Lou et al.ICLR 2024 · 294 citations
  4. When Not to Trust Language Models: Investigating Effectiveness of Parametric and Non-Parametric MemoriesAlex Mallen, Akari Asai, Victor Zhong, Rajarshi Das et al.ACL 2023 · 233 citations
  5. Quantifying Memorization Across Neural Language ModelsNicholas Carlini, Daphne Ippolito, Matthew Jagielski, Katherine Lee et al.ICLR 2023 · 158 citations

Related papers

  1. RAG or Learning? Understanding the Limits of LLM Adaptation under Continuous Knowledge Drift in the Real WorldHanbing Liu, Lang Cao, Yang LiACL Findings 2026
  2. HoH: A Dynamic Benchmark for Evaluating the Impact of Outdated Information on Retrieval-Augmented GenerationJie Ouyang, Tingyue Pan, Mingyue Cheng, Ruiran Yan et al.ACL 2025 · 14 citations
  3. Are LLMs Prescient? A Continuous Evaluation using Daily News as the OracleHui Dai, Ryan Teehan, Mengye RenICML 2025
  4. T-GRAG: A Dynamic GraphRAG Framework for Resolving Temporal Conflicts and Redundancy in Knowledge RetrievalDong Li, Yichen Niu, Ying Ai, Xiang Zou et al.ACM MM 2025 · 11 citations
  5. Benchmarking Large Language Models in Retrieval-Augmented GenerationJiawei Chen, Hongyu Lin, Xianpei Han, Le SunAAAI 2024 · 531 citations
Dusk over the sea between two cliffs drawn in fine vertical lines