Connecting Robust Shuffle Privacy and Pan-Privacy
Victor Balcer, Albert Cheu, Matthew Joseph, Jieming Mao
Abstract
In the shuffle model of differential privacy, data-holding users send randomized messages to a secure shuffler, the shuffler permutes the messages, and the resulting collection of messages must be differentially private with regard to user data. In the pan-private model, an algorithm processes a stream of data while maintaining an internal state that is differentially private with regard to the stream data. We give evidence connecting these two apparently different models.
Our results focus on robustly shuffle private protocols, whose privacy guarantees are not greatly affected by malicious users. First, we give robustly shuffle private protocols and upper bounds for counting distinct elements and uniformity testing. Second, we use pan-private lower bounds to prove robustly shuffle private lower bounds for both problems. Focusing on the dependence on the domain size k, we find that robust approximate shuffle privacy and approximate pan-privacy have additive error Θ( √ k) for counting distinct elements. For uniformity testing, we give a robust approximate shuffle private protocol with sample complexity Õ(k 2/3 ) and show that an Ω(k 2/3 ) dependence is necessary for any robust pure shuffle private tester. Finally, we show that this connection is useful in both directions: we give a pan-private adaptation of recent work on shuffle private histograms and use it to recover further separations between pan-privacy and interactive local privacy.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 852d3c82-d116-4a6c-a960-ef25da78b267Cited by top-tier papers17
- The Distributed Discrete Gaussian Mechanism for Federated Learning with Secure AggregationPeter Kairouz, Ziyu Liu, Thomas SteinkeICML 2021 · 291 citations
- The Fundamental Price of Secure Aggregation in Differentially Private Federated LearningWei-Ning Chen, Christopher A. Choquette-Choo, Peter Kairouz, Ananda Theertha SureshICML 2022 · 82 citations
- Private Counting from Anonymous Messages: Near-Optimal Accuracy with Vanishing Communication OverheadBadih Ghazi, Ravi Kumar, Pasin Manurangsi, Rasmus PaghICML 2020 · 59 citations
- The Flajolet-Martin Sketch Itself Preserves Differential Privacy: Private Counting with Minimal SpaceAdam D. Smith, Shuang Song, Abhradeep ThakurtaNeurIPS 2020 · 48 citations
- Differentially Private Aggregation in the Shuffle Model: Almost Central Accuracy in Almost a Single MessageBadih Ghazi, Ravi Kumar, Pasin Manurangsi, Rasmus Pagh et al.ICML 2021 · 45 citations
Builds on3
- BLENDER: Enabling Local Search with a Hybrid Differential Privacy ModelBrendan Avent, Aleksandra Korolova, David Zeber, Torgeir Hovden et al.USENIX Security 2017 · 101 citations
- Private Summation in the Multi-Message Shuffle ModelBorja Balle, James Bell, Adrià Gascón, Kobbi NissimCCS 2020 · 52 citations
- Exponential Separations in Local Differential PrivacyMatthew Joseph, Jieming Mao, Aaron RothSODA 2020 · 17 citations
Related papers
- Anonymized Histograms in Intermediate Privacy ModelsBadih Ghazi, Pritish Kamath, Ravi Kumar, Pasin ManurangsiNeurIPS 2022 · 6 citations
- Differentially Private Histograms in the Shuffle Model from Fake UsersAlbert Cheu, Maxim ZhilyaevS&P 2022 · 40 citations
- Adversarially Robust Streaming Algorithms via Differential PrivacyAvinatan Hassidim, Haim Kaplan, Yishay Mansour, Yossi Matias et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 85 citations
- Lightweight Protocols for Distributed Private Quantile EstimationAnders Aamand, Fabrizio Boninsegna, Abigail Gentle, Jacob Imola et al.ICML 2025
- Adversarially Robust Distributed Count Tracking via Partial Differential PrivacyZhongzheng Xiong, Xiaoyi Zhu, Zengfeng HuangNeurIPS 2023 · 2 citations
