Lightweight Protocols for Distributed Private Quantile Estimation
Anders Aamand, Fabrizio Boninsegna, Abigail Gentle, Jacob Imola, Rasmus Pagh
Abstract
Distributed data analysis is a large and growing field driven by a massive proliferation of user devices, and by privacy concerns surrounding the centralised storage of data. We consider two adaptive algorithms for estimating one quantile (e.g. the median) when each user holds a single data point lying in a domain [B] that can be queried once through a private mechanism; one under local differential privacy (LDP) and another for shuffle differential privacy (shuffle-DP). In the adaptive setting we present an ε-LDP algorithm which can estimate any quantile within error α only requiring O( log B ε 2 α 2 ) users, and an (ε, δ)-shuffle DP algorithm requiring only O(( 1 ε 2 + 1 α 2 ) log B) users. Prior (nonadaptive) algorithms require more users by several logarithmic factors in B. We further provide a matching lower bound for adaptive protocols, showing that our LDP algorithm is optimal in the low-ε regime. Additionally, we establish lower bounds against non-adaptive protocols which paired with our understanding of the adaptive case, proves a fundamental separation between these models. In this section, we will provide an algorithm for LDPstat-median using the state-of-the-art algorithm for MonotonicNBS. We prove the following: Theorem C.1. Let α ∈ 0, 1 4 and ε > 0. Suppose that the number of users n ≥ C log B
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext ebaaf929-fe8a-4c8e-9781-221d9b75779dCited by top-tier papers3
- Differentially Private Quantiles with Smaller ErrorJacob Imola, Fabrizio Boninsegna, Hannah Keller, Anders Aamand et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 4 citations
- Time-uniform and Asymptotic Confidence Sequence of Quantile under Local Differential PrivacyLeheng Cai, Qirui Hu, Juntao Sun, Shuyuan WuNeurIPS 2025 · 4 citations
- Piquant: Private Quantile Estimation in the Two-Server ModelHannah Keller, Jacob Imola, Fabrizio Boninsegna, Rasmus Pagh et al.CCS 2026
Builds on8
- Locally Differentially Private Protocols for Frequency EstimationTianhao Wang, Jeremiah Blocki, Ninghui Li, Somesh JhaUSENIX Security 2017 · 629 citations
- Hiding Among the Clones: A Simple and Nearly Optimal Analysis of Privacy Amplification by ShufflingVitaly Feldman, Audra McMillan, Kunal TalwarFOCS 2021 · 76 citations
- Frequency Estimation under Local Differential PrivacyGraham Cormode, Samuel Maddock, Carsten MapleVLDB 2021 · 70 citations
- Optimal Private Median Estimation under Minimal Distributional AssumptionsChristos Tzamos, Emmanouil V. Vlatakis-Gkaragkounis, Ilias ZadikNeurIPS 2020 · 25 citations
- Exponential Separations in Local Differential PrivacyMatthew Joseph, Jieming Mao, Aaron RothSODA 2020 · 17 citations
Related papers
- Online Local Differential Private Quantile Inference via Self-normalizationYi Liu, Qirui Hu, Lei Ding, Linglong KongICML 2023 · 7 citations
- Shuffling-Aware Optimization for Private Vector Mean EstimationShun Takagi, Seng Pei LiewICML 2026 · 2 citations
- Privacy-Aware Data Integration for Enhanced Quantile Inference under HeterogeneityLeheng Cai, Qirui Hu, Shuyuan WuICML 2026
- Frequency Estimation Under Multiparty Differential Privacy: One-shot and StreamingZiyue Huang, Yuan Qiu, Ke Yi, Graham CormodeVLDB 2022 · 28 citations
- Connecting Robust Shuffle Privacy and Pan-PrivacyVictor Balcer, Albert Cheu, Matthew Joseph, Jieming MaoSODA 2021 · 27 citations
