Market-Bench: Benchmarking Large Language Models on Economic and Trade Competition
Yushuo Zheng, Huiyu Duan, Zicheng Zhang, Yucheng Zhu, Xiongkuo Min, Guangtao Zhai
Abstract
The ability of large language models (LLMs) to manage and acquire economic resources remains unclear. In this paper, we introduce Market-Bench, a comprehensive benchmark that evaluates the capabilities of LLMs in economically-relevant tasks through economic and trade competition. Specifically, we construct a configurable multi-agent supply chain economic model where LLMs act as retailer agents responsible for procuring and retailing merchandise. In the procurement stage, LLMs bid for limited inventory in budget-constrained auctions. In the retail stage, LLMs set retail prices, generate marketing slogans, and provide them to buyers through a role-based attention mechanism for purchase. Market-Bench logs complete trajectories of bids, prices, slogans, sales, and balance-sheet states, enabling automatic evaluation with economic, operational, and semantic metrics. Benchmarking on 20 open- and closed-source LLM agents reveals significant performance disparities and winner-take-most phenomenon, i.e., only a small subset of LLM retailers can consistently achieve capital appreciation, while many hover around the break-even point despite similar semantic matching scores. Market-Bench provides a reproducible testbed for studying how LLMs interact in competitive markets.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 791269d7-8c71-4b09-aed9-7ecbda7bca06Builds on7
- Generative Agents: Interactive Simulacra of Human BehaviorJoon Sung Park, Joseph C. O'Brien, Carrie Jun Cai, Meredith Ringel Morris et al.UIST 2023 · 1,882 citations
- SOTOPIA: Interactive Evaluation for Social Intelligence in Language AgentsXuhui Zhou, Hao Zhu, Leena Mathur, Ruohong Zhang et al.ICLR 2024 · 288 citations
- MultiAgentBench : Evaluating the Collaboration and Competition of LLM agentsKunlun Zhu, Hongyi Du, Zhaochen Hong, Xiaocheng Yang et al.ACL 2025 · 97 citations
- ODI-Bench: Can MLLMs Understand Immersive Omnidirectional Environments?Liu Yang, Huiyu Duan, Ran Tao, Juntao Cheng et al.ICLR 2026 · 13 citations
- F-Bench: Rethinking Human Preference Evaluation Metrics for Benchmarking Face Generation, Customization, and RestorationLu Liu, Huiyu Duan, Qiang Hu, Liu Yang et al.ICCV 2025 · 2 citations
Related papers
- Copyright-Bench: Agentic Evaluation of Copyright Law ComplianceZheng Hui, Doni Bloomfield, Noam KoltICML 2026 · 1 citation
- CostBench: Evaluating Multi-Turn Cost-Optimal Planning and Adaptation in Dynamic Environments for LLM Tool-Use AgentsJiayu Liu, Cheng Qian, Zhaochen Su, Qing Zong et al.ACL 2026 · 19 citations
- SEC-bench: Automated Benchmarking of LLM Agents on Real-World Software Security TasksHwiwon Lee, Ziqi Zhang, Hanxiao Lu, Lingming ZhangNeurIPS 2025 · 86 citations
- BizBench: A Quantitative Reasoning Benchmark for Business and FinanceMichael Krumdick, Rik Koncel-Kedziorski, Viet Dac Lai, Varshini Reddy et al.ACL 2024 · 10 citations
- AgencyBench: Benchmarking the Frontiers of Autonomous Agents in 1M-Token Real-World ContextsKeyu Li, Junhao Shi, Yang Xiao, Mohan Jiang et al.ACL 2026 · 14 citations
