Lune

ACL2025Top-tier venue

MultiAgentBench : Evaluating the Collaboration and Competition of LLM agents

Kunlun Zhu, Hongyi Du, Zhaochen Hong, Xiaocheng Yang, Shuyi Guo, Zhe Wang, Zhenhailong Wang, Cheng Qian, Robert Tang, Heng Ji, Jiaxuan You

2025Year
97Citations
24Top-tier citations

Abstract

Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown remarkable capabilities as autonomous agents; yet existing benchmarks either focus on singleagent tasks or are confined to narrow domains, failing to capture the dynamics of multi-agent coordination and competition. In this paper, we introduce MultiAgentBench, a comprehensive benchmark designed to evaluate LLMbased multi-agent systems across diverse, interactive scenarios. Our framework measures not only task completion but also the quality of collaboration and competition using novel, milestone-based key performance indicators. Moreover, we evaluate various coordination protocols (including star, chain, tree, and graph topologies) and innovative strategies such as group discussion and cognitive planning. Notably, gpt-4o-mini reaches the average highest task score, graph structure performs the best among coordination protocols in the research scenario,and cognitive planning improves milestone achievement rates by 3%. Code and datasets are publicavailable at https: //github.com/MultiagentBench/MARBLE . * Team Leader. † Core Contributors. Contributions are listed in the appendix A.1.

Ask about this paper

Your agent reads all of it.

Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.

Questions to start from

Your agent calls

Luneget_paper_fulltext

Ask in Lune

Free to start. No credit card required.

lune papers fulltext 1c8e5e36-76fe-4e9c-a0d2-65830d8ab305

Cited by top-tier papers24

Ask how each one uses it

Builds on10

Related papers

Dusk over the sea between two cliffs drawn in fine vertical lines