BizBench: A Quantitative Reasoning Benchmark for Business and Finance
Michael Krumdick, Rik Koncel-Kedziorski, Viet Dac Lai, Varshini Reddy, Charles Lovering, Chris Tanner
Abstract
Answering questions within business and finance requires reasoning, precision, and a widebreadth of technical knowledge. Together, these requirements make this domain difficult for large language models (LLMs). We introduce BizBench, a benchmark for evaluating models' ability to reason about realistic financial problems. BizBench comprises eight quantitative reasoning tasks, focusing on questionanswering (QA) over financial data via program synthesis. We include three financiallythemed code-generation tasks from newly collected and augmented QA data. Additionally, we isolate the reasoning capabilities required for financial QA: reading comprehension of financial text and tables for extracting intermediate values, and understanding financial concepts and formulas needed to calculate complex solutions. Collectively, these tasks evaluate a model's financial background knowledge, ability to parse financial documents, and capacity to solve problems with code. We conduct an indepth evaluation of open-source and commercial LLMs, comparing and contrasting the behavior of code-focused and language-focused models. We demonstrate that the current bottleneck in performance is due to LLMs' limited business and financial understanding, highlighting the value of a challenging benchmark for quantitative reasoning within this domain.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 6e242695-9283-4f05-953c-d2ad51d2bbb4Cited by top-tier papers9
- FinanceReasoning: Benchmarking Financial Numerical Reasoning More Credible, Comprehensive and ChallengingZichen Tang, Haihong E, Ziyan Ma, Haoyang He et al.ACL 2025 · 17 citations
- FinChain: A Symbolic Benchmark for Verifiable Chain-of-Thought Financial ReasoningZhuohan Xie, Daniil Orel, Rushil Thareja, Dhruv Sahnan et al.ACL 2026 · 13 citations
- MultiFinBen: Benchmarking Large Language Models for Multilingual and Multimodal Financial ApplicationXueqing Peng, Lingfei Qian, Yan Wang, Ruoyu Xiang et al.ACL 2026 · 6 citations
- FinDVer: Explainable Claim Verification over Long and Hybrid-content Financial DocumentsYilun Zhao, Yitao Long, Tintin Jiang, Chengye Wang et al.EMNLP 2024 · 3 citations
- FinTrust: A Comprehensive Benchmark of Trustworthiness Evaluation in Finance DomainTiansheng Hu, Tongyan Hu, Liuyang Bai, Yilun Zhao et al.EMNLP 2025 · 2 citations
Builds on13
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- Large Language Models are Zero-Shot ReasonersTakeshi Kojima, Shixiang Shane Gu, Machel Reid, Yutaka Matsuo et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 8,168 citations
- WizardCoder: Empowering Code Large Language Models with Evol-InstructZiyang Luo, Can Xu, Pu Zhao, Qingfeng Sun et al.ICLR 2024 · 945 citations
- DS-1000: A Natural and Reliable Benchmark for Data Science Code GenerationYuhang Lai, Chengxi Li, Yiming Wang, Tianyi Zhang et al.ICML 2023 · 504 citations
Related papers
- FinMMR: Make Financial Numerical Reasoning More Multimodal, Comprehensive, and ChallengingZichen Tang, Haihong E, Jiacheng Liu, Zhongjun Yang et al.ICCV 2025 · 1 citation
- EDINET-Bench: Evaluating LLMs on Complex Financial Tasks using Japanese Financial StatementsIssa Sugiura, Takashi Ishida, Taro Makino, Chieko Tazuke et al.ICLR 2026 · 9 citations
- FinMathBench: A Formula-Driven Benchmark for Evaluating LLMs' Math Reasoning Capabilities in FinanceYi He, Ping Wang, Shiqiang Xiong, Chao Chen et al.AAAI 2026
- BizFinBench.v2: Towards Reliable LLMs in Finance via Real-User Data and Offline/Online Bilingual EvaluationXin Guo, Rongjunchen Zhang, Guilong Lu, Xuntao Guo et al.ICML 2026
- Can LLMs Reason About Program Semantics? A Comprehensive Evaluation of LLMs on Formal Specification InferenceThanh Le-Cong, Bach Le, Toby MurrayACL 2025
