EDINET-Bench: Evaluating LLMs on Complex Financial Tasks using Japanese Financial Statements
Issa Sugiura, Takashi Ishida, Taro Makino, Chieko Tazuke, Takanori Nakagawa, Kosuke Nakago, David Ha
Abstract
Large Language Models (LLMs) have made remarkable progress, surpassing human performance on several benchmarks in domains such as mathematics and coding. A key driver of this progress has been the development of benchmark datasets. In contrast, the financial domain poses higher entry barriers due to its demand for specialized expertise, and benchmarks remain relatively scarce compared to those in mathematics or coding. We introduce EDINET-Bench, an open-source Japanese financial benchmark designed to evaluate LLMs on challenging tasks such as accounting fraud detection, earnings forecasting, and industry classification. EDINET-Bench is constructed from ten years of annual reports filed by Japanese companies. These tasks require models to process entire annual reports and integrate information across multiple tables and textual sections, demanding expert-level reasoning that is challenging even for human professionals. Our experiments show that even state-of-the-art LLMs struggle in this domain, performing only marginally better than logistic regression in binary classification tasks such as fraud detection and earnings forecasting. Our results show that simply providing reports to LLMs in a straightforward setting is not enough. This highlights the need for benchmark frameworks that better reflect the environments in which financial professionals operate, with richer scaffolding such as realistic simulations and task-specific reasoning support to enable more effective problem solving. We make our dataset and code publicly available to support future research.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext d8a18767-e5ad-4705-bced-2002f8204a6eCited by top-tier papers2
- CapBencher: Give Your LLM Benchmark a Built-in Alarm for Test-Set OverfittingTakashi Ishida, Thanawat Lodkaew, Ikko YamaneICML 2026 · 4 citations
- Towards Scalable Oversight via Partitioned Human SupervisionRen Yin, Takashi Ishida, Masashi SugiyamaICLR 2026
Builds on10
- SWE-bench: Can Language Models Resolve Real-world Github Issues?Carlos E. Jimenez, John Yang, Alexander Wettig, Shunyu Yao et al.ICLR 2024 · 2,082 citations
- SWE-agent: Agent-Computer Interfaces Enable Automated Software EngineeringJohn Yang, Carlos E. Jimenez, Alexander Wettig, Kilian Lieret et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 2,059 citations
- Proving Test Set Contamination in Black-Box Language ModelsYonatan Oren, Nicole Meister, Niladri S. Chatterji, Faisal Ladhak et al.ICLR 2024 · 220 citations
- Time Travel in LLMs: Tracing Data Contamination in Large Language ModelsShahriar Golchin, Mihai SurdeanuICLR 2024 · 165 citations
- ConvFinQA: Exploring the Chain of Numerical Reasoning in Conversational Finance Question AnsweringZhiyu Chen, Shiyang Li, Charese Smiley, Zhiqiang Ma et al.EMNLP 2022 · 57 citations
Related papers
- BizBench: A Quantitative Reasoning Benchmark for Business and FinanceMichael Krumdick, Rik Koncel-Kedziorski, Viet Dac Lai, Varshini Reddy et al.ACL 2024 · 10 citations
- FinChart-Bench: Benchmarking Financial Chart Comprehension in Vision-Language ModelsDong Shu, Haoyang Yuan, Yuchen Wang, Yanguang Liu et al.ACL 2026 · 11 citations
- FinMMR: Make Financial Numerical Reasoning More Multimodal, Comprehensive, and ChallengingZichen Tang, Haihong E, Jiacheng Liu, Zhongjun Yang et al.ICCV 2025 · 1 citation
- FinRpt: Dataset, Evaluation System and LLM-based Multi-agent Framework for Equity Research Report GenerationSong Jin, Shuqi Li, Shukun Zhang, Rui YanAAAI 2026 · 1 citation
- When FLUE Meets FLANG: Benchmarks and Large Pretrained Language Model for Financial DomainRaj Sanjay Shah, Kunal Chawla, Dheeraj Eidnani, Agam Shah et al.EMNLP 2022 · 63 citations
