Online Detection of LLM-Generated Texts via Sequential Hypothesis Testing by Betting
Can Chen, Jun-Kun Wang
Abstract
Developing algorithms to differentiate between machine-generated texts and human-written texts has garnered substantial attention in recent years. Existing methods in this direction typically concern an offline setting where a dataset containing a mix of real and machine-generated texts is given upfront, and the task is to determine whether each sample in the dataset is from a large language model (LLM) or a human. However, in many practical scenarios, sources such as news websites, social media accounts, and online forums publish content in a streaming fashion. Therefore, in this online scenario, how to quickly and accurately determine whether the source is an LLM with strong statistical guarantees is crucial for these media or platforms to function effectively and prevent the spread of misinformation and other potential misuse of LLMs. To tackle the problem of online detection, we develop an algorithm based on the techniques of sequential hypothesis testing by betting that not only builds upon and complements existing offline detection techniques but also enjoys statistical guarantees, which include a controlled false positive rate and the expected time to correctly identify a source as an LLM. Experiments were conducted to demonstrate the effectiveness of our method. Select a Score Function 𝜙(•) 𝑥t 𝜙(𝑥𝑡) 𝜙(𝑦𝑡) Update 𝜃𝑡 via ONS
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 73f38972-48cb-4a3b-8eb7-b656458c1682Cited by top-tier papers4
- Testing For Distribution Shifts with Conditional Conformal Test MartingalesShalev Shaer, Yarin Bar, Drew Prinster, Yaniv RomanoICML 2026 · 1 citation
- On the Salience of Low-Probability Tokens for AI-Generated Text Detection: A Multiscale Uncertainty PerspectiveYikai Guo, Bin Wang, Xilai Fan, Wenjun Ke et al.ICML 2026
- DetectRL-X: Towards Reliable Multilingual and Real-World LLM-Generated Text DetectionJunchao Wu, Yefeng Liu, Chenyu Zhu, Hao Zhang et al.ACL 2026
- Model-Agnostic Sentiment Distribution Stability Analysis for Robust LLM-Generated Texts DetectionSiyuan Li, Xi Lin, Guangyan Li, Zehao Liu et al.AAAI 2026
Builds on20
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- DetectGPT: Zero-Shot Machine-Generated Text Detection using Probability CurvatureEric Mitchell, Yoonho Lee, Alexander Khazatsky, Christopher D. Manning et al.ICML 2023 · 988 citations
- A Watermark for Large Language ModelsJohn Kirchenbauer, Jonas Geiping, Yuxin Wen, Jonathan Katz et al.ICML 2023 · 854 citations
- Provable Robust Watermarking for AI-Generated TextXuandong Zhao, Prabhanjan Vijendra Ananth, Lei Li, Yu-Xiang WangICLR 2024 · 312 citations
- Fast-DetectGPT: Efficient Zero-Shot Detection of Machine-Generated Text via Conditional Probability CurvatureGuangsheng Bao, Yanbin Zhao, Zhiyang Teng, Linyi Yang et al.ICLR 2024 · 311 citations
Related papers
- MAGE: Machine-generated Text Detection in the WildYafu Li, Qintong Li, Leyang Cui, Wei Bi et al.ACL 2024 · 44 citations
- Enhancing LLM Text Detection with Retrieved Contexts and Logits Distribution ConsistencyZhaoheng Huang, Yutao Zhu, Ji-Rong Wen, Zhicheng DouEMNLP 2025
- AI 'News' Content Farms Are Easy to Make and Hard to Detect: A Case Study in ItalianGiovanni Puccetti, Anna Rogers, Chiara Alzetta, Felice Dell'Orletta et al.ACL 2024 · 1 citation
- AdaDetectGPT: Adaptive Detection of LLM-Generated Text with Statistical GuaranteesHongyi Zhou, Jin Zhu, Pingfan Su, Kai Ye et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 23 citations
- Segmenting Watermarked Texts From Language ModelsXingchi Li, Guanxun Li, Xianyang ZhangNeurIPS 2024 · 5 citations
