Model-Agnostic Sentiment Distribution Stability Analysis for Robust LLM-Generated Texts Detection
Siyuan Li, Xi Lin, Guangyan Li, Zehao Liu, Aodu Wulianghai, Li Ding, Jun Wu, Jianhua Li
Abstract
The rapid advancement of large language models (LLMs) has resulted in increasingly sophisticated AI-generated content, posing significant challenges in distinguishing LLMgenerated text from human-written language. Existing detection methods, primarily based on lexical heuristics or fine-tuned classifiers, often suffer from limited generalizability and are vulnerable to paraphrasing, adversarial perturbations, and cross-domain shifts. In this work, we propose SentiDetect , a model-agnostic framework for detecting LLM-generated text by analyzing the divergence in sentiment distribution stability. Our method is motivated by the empirical observation that LLM outputs tend to exhibit emotionally consistent patterns, whereas human-written texts display greater emotional variability. To capture this phenomenon, we define two complementary metrics: sentiment distribution consistency and sentiment distribution preservation, which quantify stability under sentiment-altering and semantic-preserving transformations. We evaluate SentiDetect on five diverse datasets and a range of advanced LLMs, including Gemini-1.5-Pro, Claude-3, GPT-4-0613, and LLaMa-3.3. Experimental results demonstrate its superiority over state-of-the-art baselines, with over 16% and 11% F1 score improvements on Gemini-1.5-Pro and GPT-4-0613, respectively. Moreover, SentiDetect also shows greater robustness to paraphrasing, adversarial attacks, and text length variations, outperforming existing detectors in challenging scenarios.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 788b01cc-41b7-480c-b699-6e295367e66dBuilds on18
- DetectGPT: Zero-Shot Machine-Generated Text Detection using Probability CurvatureEric Mitchell, Yoonho Lee, Alexander Khazatsky, Christopher D. Manning et al.ICML 2023 · 988 citations
- A Watermark for Large Language ModelsJohn Kirchenbauer, Jonas Geiping, Yuxin Wen, Jonathan Katz et al.ICML 2023 · 854 citations
- Paraphrasing evades detectors of AI-generated text, but retrieval is an effective defenseKalpesh Krishna, Yixiao Song, Marzena Karpinska, John Wieting et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 657 citations
- RADAR: Robust AI-Text Detection via Adversarial LearningXiaomeng Hu, Pin-Yu Chen, Tsung-Yi HoNeurIPS 2023 · 315 citations
- Fast-DetectGPT: Efficient Zero-Shot Detection of Machine-Generated Text via Conditional Probability CurvatureGuangsheng Bao, Yanbin Zhao, Zhiyang Teng, Linyi Yang et al.ICLR 2024 · 311 citations
Related papers
- Stability-Aware Feature Design for Robust Watermark Detection in Machine-Generated TextSina Mansouri, Mohit Marvania, Abolfazl SafikhaniICML 2026
- Learning to Rewrite: Generalized LLM-Generated Text DetectionWei Hao, Ran Li, Weiliang Zhao, Junfeng Yang et al.ACL 2025
- Adversarial Paraphrasing: A Universal Attack for Humanizing AI-Generated TextYize Cheng, Vinu Sankar Sadasivan, Mehrdad Saberi, Shoumik Saha et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 28 citations
- DALD: Improving Logits-based Detector without Logits from Black-box LLMsCong Zeng, Shengkun Tang, Xianjun Yang, Yuanzhou Chen et al.NeurIPS 2024
- Robust Fake News Detection using Large Language Models under Adversarial Sentiment AttacksSahar Tahmasebi, Eric Müller-Budack, Ralph EwerthWWW 2026 · 3 citations
