Sociotechnical Audits: Broadening the Algorithm Auditing Lens to Investigate Targeted Advertising
Michelle S. Lam, Ayush Pandit, Colin H. Kalicki, Rachit Gupta, Poonam Sahoo, Danaë Metaxa
Abstract
Algorithm audits are powerful tools for studying black-box systems without direct knowledge of their inner workings. While very effective in examining technical components, the method stops short of a sociotechnical frame, which would also consider users themselves as an integral and dynamic part of the system. Addressing this limitation, we propose the concept of sociotechnical auditing: auditing methods that evaluate algorithmic systems at the sociotechnical level, focusing on the interplay between algorithms and users as each impacts the other. Just as algorithm audits probe an algorithm with varied inputs and observe outputs, a sociotechnical audit (STA) additionally probes users, exposing them to different algorithmic behavior and measuring their resulting attitudes and behaviors. As an example of this method, we develop Intervenr, a platform for conducting browser-based, longitudinal sociotechnical audits with consenting, compensated participants. Intervenr investigates the algorithmic content users encounter online, and also coordinates systematic client-side interventions to understand how users change in response. As a case study, we deploy Intervenr in a two-week sociotechnical audit of online advertising (N = 244) to investigate the central premise that personalized ad targeting is more effective on users. In the first week, we observe and collect all browser ads delivered to users, and in the second, we deploy an ablation-style intervention that disrupts normal targeting by randomly pairing participants and swapping all their ads. We collect user-oriented metrics (self-reported ad interest and feeling of representation) and advertiser-oriented metrics (ad views, clicks, and recognition) throughout, along with a total of over 500,000 ads. Our STA finds that targeted ads indeed perform better with users, but also that users begin to acclimate to different ads in only a week, casting doubt on the primacy of personalized ad targeting given the impact of repeated exposure. In comparison with other evaluation methods that only study technical components, or only experiment on users, sociotechnical audits evaluate sociotechnical systems through the interplay of their technical and human components.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 7317e098-0ae9-4d82-938c-106eab083451Cited by top-tier papers15
- Towards AI Accountability Infrastructure: Gaps and Opportunities in AI Audit ToolingVictor Ojewale, Ryan Steed, Briana Vecchione, Abeba Birhane et al.CHI 2025 · 46 citations
- Wikibench: Community-Driven Data Curation for AI Evaluation on WikipediaTzu-Sheng Kuo, Aaron Lee Halfaker, Zirui Cheng, Jiwoo Kim et al.CHI 2024 · 19 citations
- Lower Quantity, Higher Quality: Auditing News Content and User Perceptions on Twitter/X Algorithmic versus Chronological TimelinesStephanie T. Wang, Shengchun Huang, Alvin Zhou, Danaë MetaxaCSCW 2024 · 11 citations
- Access Denied: Meaningful Data Access for Quantitative Algorithm AuditsJuliette Zaccour, Reuben Binns, Luc RocherCHI 2025 · 9 citations
- Thoughtful Adoption of NLP for Civic Participation: Understanding Differences Among PolicymakersJose A. Guridi, Cristobal Cheyre, Qian YangCSCW 2025 · 9 citations
Builds on8
- Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language SupervisionAlec Radford, Jong Wook Kim, Chris Hallacy, Aditya Ramesh et al.ICML 2021 · 47,906 citations
- Problematic Machine Behavior: A Systematic Literature Review of Algorithm AuditsJack BandyCSCW 2021 · 190 citations
- Everyday Algorithm Auditing: Understanding the Power of Everyday Users in Surfacing Harmful Algorithmic BehaviorsHong Shen, Alicia DeVos, Motahhare Eslami, Kenneth HolsteinCSCW 2021 · 156 citations
- Auditing for Discrimination in Algorithms Delivering Job AdsBasileal Imana, Aleksandra Korolova, John S. HeidemannWWW 2021 · 105 citations
- 'I Just Want to Hack Myself to Not Get Distracted': Evaluating Design Interventions for Self-Control on FacebookUlrik Lyngs, Kai Lukoff, Petr Slovák, William Seymour et al.CHI 2020 · 105 citations
Related papers
- Beyond the Checkbox: Strengthening DSA Compliance Through Social Media Algorithmic AuditingSara Solarova, Matús Mesarcík, Branislav Pecher, Ivan SrbaCHI 2026 · 2 citations
- Characterizing the Usability and Usefulness of U.S. Ad Transparency SystemsKevin Bryson, Arthur Borem, Phoebe Moh, Omer Akgul et al.S&P 2025
- Why am I seeing this: Democratizing End User Auditing for Online Content RecommendationsChaoran Chen, Leyang Li, Luke Cao, Yanfang Ye et al.UIST 2025 · 4 citations
- Regulating algorithmic filtering on social mediaSarah Huiyi Cen, Devavrat ShahNeurIPS 2021 · 12 citations
- Toward User-Driven Algorithm Auditing: Investigating users' strategies for uncovering harmful algorithmic behaviorAlicia DeVos, Aditi Dhabalia, Hong Shen, Kenneth Holstein et al.CHI 2022 · 96 citations
