Software-Supported Audits of Decision-Making Systems: Testing Google and Facebook's Political Advertising Policies

How can society understand and hold accountable complex human and algorithmic decision-making systems whose systematic errors are opaque to the public? These systems routinely make decisions on individual rights and well-being, and on protecting society and the democratic process. Practical and statistical constraints on external audits-such as dimensional complexity-can lead researchers and regulators to miss important sources of error in these complex decision-making systems. In this paper, we design and implement a softwaresupported approach to audit studies that auto-generates audit materials and coordinates volunteer activity. We implemented this software in the case of political advertising policies enacted by Facebook and Google during the 2018 U.S. election. Guided by this software, a team of volunteers posted 477 auto-generated ads and analyzed the companies' actions, finding systematic errors in how companies enforced policies. We find that software can overcome some common constraints of audit studies, within limitations related to sample size and volunteer capacity.

CCS Concepts: • Human-centered computing → Empirical studies in collaborative and social computing.