Having your Privacy Cake and Eating it Too: Platform-supported Auditing of Social Media Algorithms for Public Interest
Basileal Imana, Aleksandra Korolova, John S. Heidemann
Abstract
Social media platforms curate access to information and opportunities, and so play a critical role in shaping public discourse today. The opaque nature of the algorithms these platforms use to curate content raises societal questions. Prior studies have used black-box methods led by experts or collaborative audits driven by everyday users to show that these algorithms can lead to biased or discriminatory outcomes. However, existing auditing methods face fundamental limitations because they function independent of the platforms. Concerns of potential harmful outcomes have prompted proposal of legislation in both the U.S. and the E.U. to mandate a new form of auditing where vetted external researchers get privileged access to social media platforms. Unfortunately, to date there have been no concrete technical proposals to provide such auditing, because auditing at scale risks disclosure of users' private data and platforms' proprietary algorithms. We propose a new method for platform-supported auditing that can meet the goals of the proposed legislation. The first contribution of our work is to enumerate the challenges and the limitations of existing auditing methods to implement these policies at scale. Second, we suggest that limited, privileged access to relevance estimators is the key to enabling generalizable platform-supported auditing of social media platforms by external researchers. Third, we show platform-supported auditing need not risk user privacy nor disclosure of platforms' business interests by proposing an auditing framework that protects against these risks. For a particular fairness metric, we show that ensuring privacy imposes only a small constant factor increase (6.34x as an upper bound, and 4× for typical parameters) in the number of samples required for accurate auditing. Our technical contributions, combined with ongoing legal and policy efforts, can enable public oversight into how social media platforms affect individuals and society by moving past the privacy-vs-transparency hurdle.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 255c68b4-3b07-448b-822a-43d8c00da1acCited by top-tier papers2
- Secure and Confidential Certificates of Online FairnessOlive Franzese, Ali Shahin Shamsabadi, Carter Luck, Hamed HaddadiNeurIPS 2025 · 10 citations
- Access Denied: Meaningful Data Access for Quantitative Algorithm AuditsJuliette Zaccour, Reuben Binns, Luc RocherCHI 2025 · 9 citations
Builds on7
- Problematic Machine Behavior: A Systematic Literature Review of Algorithm AuditsJack BandyCSCW 2021 · 190 citations
- Everyday Algorithm Auditing: Understanding the Power of Everyday Users in Surfacing Harmful Algorithmic BehaviorsHong Shen, Alicia DeVos, Motahhare Eslami, Kenneth HolsteinCSCW 2021 · 156 citations
- Auditing for Discrimination in Algorithms Delivering Job AdsBasileal Imana, Aleksandra Korolova, John S. HeidemannWWW 2021 · 105 citations
- Toward User-Driven Algorithm Auditing: Investigating users' strategies for uncovering harmful algorithmic behaviorAlicia DeVos, Aditi Dhabalia, Hong Shen, Kenneth Holstein et al.CHI 2022 · 96 citations
- Image Cropping on Twitter: Fairness Metrics, their Limitations, and the Importance of Representation, Design, and AgencyKyra Yee, Uthaipon Tantipongpipat, Shubhanshu MishraCSCW 2021 · 52 citations
Related papers
- Regulating algorithmic filtering on social mediaSarah Huiyi Cen, Devavrat ShahNeurIPS 2021 · 12 citations
- Beyond the Checkbox: Strengthening DSA Compliance Through Social Media Algorithmic AuditingSara Solarova, Matús Mesarcík, Branislav Pecher, Ivan SrbaCHI 2026 · 2 citations
- Software-Supported Audits of Decision-Making Systems: Testing Google and Facebook's Political Advertising PoliciesJ. Nathan Matias, Austin Hounsel, Nick FeamsterCSCW 2022 · 17 citations
- Robust ML Auditing using Prior KnowledgeJade Garcia Bourrée, Augustin Godinot, Sayan Biswas, Anne-Marie Kermarrec et al.ICML 2025
- Understanding Practices, Challenges, and Opportunities for User-Engaged Algorithm Auditing in Industry PracticeWesley Hanwen Deng, Bill Boyuan Guo, Alicia DeVrio, Hong Shen et al.CHI 2023 · 73 citations
