Characterizing the Usability and Usefulness of U.S. Ad Transparency Systems
Kevin Bryson, Arthur Borem, Phoebe Moh, Omer Akgul, Laura Edelson, Tobias Lauinger, Michelle L. Mazurek, Damon McCoy, Blase Ur
Abstract
Online targeted ads are those shown only to certain users based on interests, demographics, or behaviors. Because targeted ads raise many privacy concerns, many platforms provide ad transparency systems (ATSs) to inform users about this practice. To better understand what current ATSs are communicating to users—and how—we first taxonomized the design and content of 22 of the most popular English-language websites' ATSs as presented to users in the United States. We found substantial differences across ATSs in both the prevalence of transparency-enhancing features (e.g., whether they show users what has been inferred about them) and the presentation of information (e.g., the terminology used, where settings are located). Across all platforms, however, we observed consistent ambiguity about what data is used to target ads and the actual impact of altering settings. To gauge how these different design choices impact users, we conducted an online user study in which 198 participants used their own account to explore the ATS of one of eight representative platforms. We found that many of the questions participants hoped the ATS would answer remained unanswered after exploring the ATS. More broadly, participants found current ATSs simultaneously complex and lacking key details. We pinpoint ATS design decisions that best support users.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext ee22e805-e0ef-4d7f-9e42-13a5e453fdd2Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on11
- Tranco: A Research-Oriented Top Sites Ranking Hardened Against ManipulationVictor Le Pochat, Tom van Goethem, Samaneh Tajalizadehkhoob, Maciej Korczynski et al.NDSS 2019 · 826 citations
- Auditing for Discrimination in Algorithms Delivering Job AdsBasileal Imana, Aleksandra Korolova, John S. HeidemannWWW 2021 · 105 citations
- "Okay, whatever": An Evaluation of Cookie Consent InterfacesHana Habib, Megan Li, Ellie Young, Lorrie Faith CranorCHI 2022 · 103 citations
- Measuring the Facebook Advertising EcosystemAthanasios Andreou, Márcio Silva, Fabrício Benevenuto, Oana Goga et al.NDSS 2019 · 76 citations
- Investigating Ad Transparency Mechanisms in Social Media: A Case Study of Facebooks ExplanationsAthanasios Andreou, Giridhari Venkatadri, Oana Goga, Krishna P. Gummadi et al.NDSS 2018 · 68 citations
Related papers
- What Twitter Knows: Characterizing Ad Targeting Practices, User Perceptions, and Ad Explanations Through Users' Own Twitter DataMiranda Wei, Madison Stamos, Sophie Veys, Nathan Reitinger et al.USENIX Security 2020
- When and Why Do People Want Ad Targeting Explanations? Evidence from a Four-Week, Mixed-Methods Field StudyHao-Ping (Hank) Lee, Jacob Logas, Stephanie S. Yang, Zhouyu Li et al.S&P 2023
- "It's a scavenger hunt": Usability of Websites' Opt-Out and Data Deletion ChoicesHana Habib, Sarah Pearman, Jiamin Wang, Yixin Zou et al.CHI 2020 · 113 citations
- Quantity vs. Quality: Evaluating User Interest Profiles Using Ad Preference ManagersMuhammad Ahmad Bashir, Umar Farooq, Maryam Shahid, Muhammad Fareed Zaffar et al.NDSS 2019 · 41 citations
- Identifying User Needs for Advertising Controls on FacebookHana Habib, Sarah Pearman, Ellie Young, Ishika Saxena et al.CSCW 2022 · 28 citations
