MPCC: A Novel Benchmark for Multimodal Planning with Complex Constraints in Multimodal Large Language Models
Yiyan Ji, Haoran Chen, Qiguang Chen, Chengyue Wu, Libo Qin, Wanxiang Che
Abstract
Multimodal planning capabilities refer to the ability to predict, reason, and design steps for task execution with multimodal context, which is essential for complex reasoning and decision-making across multiple steps. However, current benchmarks face two key challenges: (1) they cannot directly assess multimodal real-world planning capabilities, and (2) they lack constraints or implicit constraints across modalities. To address these issues, we introduce Multimodal Planning with Complex Constraints (MPCC), the first benchmark to systematically evaluate MLLMs' ability to handle multimodal constraints in planning. To address the first challenge, MPCC focuses on three real-world tasks: Flight Planning, Calendar Planning, and Meeting Planning. To solve the second challenge, we introduce complex constraints (e.g. budget, temporal, and spatial) in these tasks, with graded difficulty levels (EASY, MEDIUM, HARD) to separate constraint complexity from search space expansion. Experiments on 13 advanced MLLMs reveal significant challenges: closed-source models achieve only 21.3% feasible plans, while open-source models average below 11%. Additionally, we observe that MLLMs are highly sensitive to constraint complexity and that traditional multimodal prompting strategies fail in multi-constraint scenarios. Our work formalizes multimodal constraints in planning, provides a rigorous evaluation framework, and highlights the need for advancements in constraint-aware reasoning for real-world MLLM applications.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers2
- OMIBench: Benchmarking Olympiad-Level Multi-Image Reasoning in Large Vision-Language ModelsQiguang Chen, Chengyu Luan, Jiajun Wu, Qiming Yu et al.ACL 2026 · 1 citation
- Aware First, Think Less: Dynamic Boundary Self-Awareness Drives Significant Gains in Reasoning Efficiency in Large Language ModelsQiguang Chen, Dengyun Peng, Jinhao Liu, Huikang Su et al.AAAI 2026
Builds on18
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- Large Language Models are Zero-Shot ReasonersTakeshi Kojima, Shixiang Shane Gu, Machel Reid, Yutaka Matsuo et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 8,168 citations
- WebArena: A Realistic Web Environment for Building Autonomous AgentsShuyan Zhou, Frank F. Xu, Hao Zhu, Xuhui Zhou et al.ICLR 2024 · 1,197 citations
- A Survey on In-context LearningQingxiu Dong, Lei Li, Damai Dai, Ce Zheng et al.EMNLP 2024 · 479 citations
- Plan-and-Solve Prompting: Improving Zero-Shot Chain-of-Thought Reasoning by Large Language ModelsLei Wang, Wanyu Xu, Yihuai Lan, Zhiqiang Hu et al.ACL 2023 · 249 citations
Related papers
- VSP: Diagnosing the Dual Challenges of Perception and Reasoning in Spatial Planning Tasks for MLLMSQiucheng Wu, Handong Zhao, Michael Saxon, Trung Bui et al.ICCV 2025 · 1 citation
- Wide-Horizon Thinking and Simulation-Based Evaluation for Real-World LLM Planning with Multifaceted ConstraintsDongjie Yang, Chengqiang Lu, Qimeng Wang, Xinbei Ma et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 6 citations
- TCP: a Benchmark for Temporal Constraint-Based PlanningZifeng Ding, Sikuan Yan, Moy Yuan, Xianglong Hu et al.EMNLP 2025
- DeepPlanning: Benchmarking Long-Horizon Agentic Planning with Verifiable ConstraintsYinger Zhang, Shutong Jiang, Renhao Li, Jianhong Tu et al.ACL 2026 · 21 citations
- Beyond Itinerary Planning - A Real-World Benchmark for Multi-Turn and Tool-Using Travel TasksXiang Cheng, Yulan Hu, Xiangwen Zhang, Lu Xu et al.ACL 2026 · 4 citations
