TCP: a Benchmark for Temporal Constraint-Based Planning
Zifeng Ding, Sikuan Yan, Moy Yuan, Xianglong Hu, Fangru Lin, Andreas Vlachos
Abstract
Temporal reasoning and planning are essential capabilities for large language models (LLMs), yet most existing benchmarks evaluate them in isolation and under limited forms of complexity. To address this gap, we introduce the Temporal Constraint-based Planning (TCP) benchmark, that jointly assesses both capabilities. Each instance in TCP features a naturalistic dialogue around a collaborative project, where diverse and interdependent temporal constraints are explicitly or implicitly expressed, and models must infer an optimal schedule that satisfies all constraints. To construct TCP, we generate abstract problem prototypes that are then paired with realistic scenarios from various domains and enriched into dialogues using an LLM. A human quality check is performed on a sampled subset to confirm the reliability of our benchmark. We evaluate state-of-the-art LLMs and find that even the strongest models may struggle with TCP, highlighting its difficulty and revealing limitations in LLMs' temporal constraint-based planning abilities. We analyze underlying failure cases, open source our benchmark 1 , and hope our findings can inspire future research.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 6a459834-0e57-49d0-8cb9-b307b715631cCited by top-tier papers3
- DeepPlanning: Benchmarking Long-Horizon Agentic Planning with Verifiable ConstraintsYinger Zhang, Shutong Jiang, Renhao Li, Jianhong Tu et al.ACL 2026 · 21 citations
- Can Large Language Models Generalize Procedures Across Representations?Fangru Lin, Valentin Hofmann, Xingchen Wan, Weixing Wang et al.ICML 2026 · 2 citations
- Evaluating Temporal Consistency in Multi-Turn Language ModelsYash Kumar Atri, Steven L. Johnson, Thomas HartvigsenACL 2026 · 1 citation
Builds on9
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- Efficient Memory Management for Large Language Model Serving with PagedAttentionWoosuk Kwon, Zhuohan Li, Siyuan Zhuang, Ying Sheng et al.SOSP 2023 · 1,016 citations
- TravelPlanner: A Benchmark for Real-World Planning with Language AgentsJian Xie, Kai Zhang, Jiangjie Chen, Tinghui Zhu et al.ICML 2024 · 376 citations
- SelfCheck: Using LLMs to Zero-Shot Check Their Own Step-by-Step ReasoningNing Miao, Yee Whye Teh, Tom RainforthICLR 2024 · 195 citations
- Graph-enhanced Large Language Models in Asynchronous Plan ReasoningFangru Lin, Emanuele La Malfa, Valentin Hofmann, Elle Michelle Yang et al.ICML 2024 · 33 citations
Related papers
- Do Language Models Have a Common Sense regarding Time? Revisiting Temporal Commonsense Reasoning in the Era of Large Language ModelsRaghav Jain, Daivik Sojitra, Arkadeep Acharya, Sriparna Saha et al.EMNLP 2023 · 17 citations
- ACPBench: Reasoning About Action, Change, and PlanningHarsha Kokel, Michael Katz, Kavitha Srinivas, Shirin SohrabiAAAI 2025 · 35 citations
- TimeBench: A Comprehensive Evaluation of Temporal Reasoning Abilities in Large Language ModelsZheng Chu, Jingchang Chen, Qianglong Chen, Weijiang Yu et al.ACL 2024 · 12 citations
- Living in the Moment: Can Large Language Models Grasp Co-Temporal Reasoning?Zhaochen Su, Juntao Li, Jun Zhang, Tong Zhu et al.ACL 2024
- MCP-Bench: Benchmarking Tool-Using LLM Agents with Complex Real-World Tasks via MCP ServersZhenting Wang, Qi Chang, Hemani Patel, Shashank Biju et al.ICLR 2026 · 109 citations
