Graph-enhanced Large Language Models in Asynchronous Plan Reasoning
Fangru Lin, Emanuele La Malfa, Valentin Hofmann, Elle Michelle Yang, Anthony G. Cohn, Janet B. Pierrehumbert
Abstract
Planning is a fundamental property of human intelligence. Reasoning about asynchronous plans is challenging since it requires sequential and parallel planning to optimize time costs. Can large language models (LLMs) succeed at this task? Here, we present the first large-scale study investigating this question. We find that a representative set of closed and open-source LLMs, including GPT-4 and LLaMA-2, behave poorly when not supplied with illustrations about the task-solving process in our benchmark Asyn-cHow. We propose a novel technique called Plan Like a Graph (PLaG) that combines graphs with natural language prompts and achieves state-ofthe-art results. We show that although PLaG can boost model performance, LLMs still suffer from drastic degradation when task complexity increases, highlighting the limits of utilizing LLMs for simulating digital devices. We see our study as an exciting step towards using LLMs as efficient autonomous agents. Our code and data are available at https://github.com/ fangru-lin/graph-llm-asynchow-plan .
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 5f189257-4d43-4d0e-97b1-ecaee471eeddCited by top-tier papers6
- PlanGenLLMs: A Modern Survey of LLM Planning CapabilitiesHui Wei, Zihao Zhang, Shenghua He, Tian Xia et al.ACL 2025 · 78 citations
- Assessing Dialect Fairness and Robustness of Large Language Models in Reasoning TasksFangru Lin, Shaoguang Mao, Emanuele La Malfa, Valentin Hofmann et al.ACL 2025 · 14 citations
- Can Large Language Models Generalize Procedures Across Representations?Fangru Lin, Valentin Hofmann, Xingchen Wan, Weixing Wang et al.ICML 2026 · 2 citations
- Robotouille: An Asynchronous Planning Benchmark for LLM AgentsGonzalo Gonzalez-Pumariega, Leong Su Yean, Neha Sunkara, Sanjiban ChoudhuryICLR 2025
- TCP: a Benchmark for Temporal Constraint-Based PlanningZifeng Ding, Sikuan Yan, Moy Yuan, Xianglong Hu et al.EMNLP 2025
Builds on17
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- Reflexion: language agents with verbal reinforcement learningNoah Shinn, Federico Cassano, Ashwin Gopinath, Karthik Narasimhan et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 5,828 citations
- Tree of Thoughts: Deliberate Problem Solving with Large Language ModelsShunyu Yao, Dian Yu, Jeffrey Zhao, Izhak Shafran et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 5,068 citations
- Language Models as Zero-Shot Planners: Extracting Actionable Knowledge for Embodied AgentsWenlong Huang, Pieter Abbeel, Deepak Pathak, Igor MordatchICML 2022 · 1,539 citations
Related papers
- LLMs Can Plan Only If We Tell ThemBilgehan Sel, Ruoxi Jia, Ming JinICLR 2025
- Generalized Planning in PDDL Domains with Pretrained Large Language ModelsTom Silver, Soham Dan, Kavitha Srinivas, Joshua B. Tenenbaum et al.AAAI 2024 · 194 citations
- Reasoning with Language Model is Planning with World ModelShibo Hao, Yi Gu, Haodi Ma, Joshua Jiahua Hong et al.EMNLP 2023 · 109 citations
- Thought of Search: Planning with Language Models Through The Lens of EfficiencyMichael Katz, Harsha Kokel, Kavitha Srinivas, Shirin SohrabiNeurIPS 2024 · 50 citations
- Can Language Models Solve Graph Problems in Natural Language?Heng Wang, Shangbin Feng, Tianxing He, Zhaoxuan Tan et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 420 citations
