VSP: Diagnosing the Dual Challenges of Perception and Reasoning in Spatial Planning Tasks for MLLMS
Qiucheng Wu, Handong Zhao, Michael Saxon, Trung Bui, William Yang Wang, Yang Zhang, Shiyu Chang
Abstract
Multimodal large language models are an exciting emerging class of language models (LMs) that have merged classic LM capabilities with those of image processing systems. However, how these capabilities integrate is often not intuitive and warrants direct investigation. One understudied capability in MLLMs is visual spatial planning-the ability to comprehend the spatial arrangements of objects and devise action plans to achieve desired outcomes in visual scenes. It is unclear why MLLMs fall short on these tasks generally considered easy for humans, given their successes across other diverse scenarios. To this end, we introduce VSP, a benchmark that 1) evaluates the spatial planning capability in MLLMs in general, and 2) diagnoses this capability via finer-grained sub-tasks, including perception and reasoning, and measure the capabilities of models through these sub-tasks. Our evaluation confirms that both open-source and private MLLMs fail to generate effective plans for even simple spatial planning tasks. Evaluations on the fine-grained analytical tasks further reveal fundamental deficiencies in the models' visual perception and bottlenecks in reasoning abilities, explaining their worse performance in the general spatial planning tasks. Our work illuminates future directions for improving MLLMs' abilities in spatial planning. Our benchmark is publicly available 1 .
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext beee5b57-c928-4e37-9d77-4d2181a8e0d8Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on27
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- Visual Instruction TuningHaotian Liu, Chunyuan Li, Qingyang Wu, Yong Jae LeeNeurIPS 2023 · 11,349 citations
- Flamingo: a Visual Language Model for Few-Shot LearningJean-Baptiste Alayrac, Jeff Donahue, Pauline Luc, Antoine Miech et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 6,707 citations
- Reflexion: language agents with verbal reinforcement learningNoah Shinn, Federico Cassano, Ashwin Gopinath, Karthik Narasimhan et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 5,828 citations
- Tree of Thoughts: Deliberate Problem Solving with Large Language ModelsShunyu Yao, Dian Yu, Jeffrey Zhao, Izhak Shafran et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 5,068 citations
Related papers
- SpatialViz-Bench: A Cognitively-Grounded Benchmark for Diagnosing Spatial Visualization in MLLMsSiting Wang, Minnan Pei, Luoyang Sun, Cheng Deng et al.ICLR 2026 · 8 citations
- SpaCE-Eval: A Benchmark for Real-World Multi-Modal ReasoningXuyou Yang, Yucheng Zhao, Wenxuan Zhang, Immanuel KohICLR 2026
- SpaCE-10: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Multimodal Large Language Models in Compositional Spatial IntelligenceZiyang Gong, Wenhao Li, Xianzheng Ma, Songyuan Li et al.ICLR 2026 · 23 citations
- MMSI-Bench: A Benchmark for Multi-Image Spatial IntelligenceSihan Yang, Runsen Xu, Yiman Xie, Sizhe Yang et al.ICLR 2026 · 195 citations
- SpatiaLab: Can Vision-Language Models Perform Spatial Reasoning in the Wild?Azmine Toushik Wasi, Wahid Faisal, Abdur Rahman, Mahfuz Ahmed Anik et al.ICLR 2026 · 13 citations
