Aware First, Think Less: Dynamic Boundary Self-Awareness Drives Significant Gains in Reasoning Efficiency in Large Language Models
Qiguang Chen, Dengyun Peng, Jinhao Liu, Huikang Su, Jiannan Guan, Libo Qin, Wanxiang Che
Abstract
Recent advancements in large language models (LLMs) have greatly improved their capabilities on complex reasoning tasks through Long Chain-of-Thought (CoT). However, this approach often results in substantial redundancy, impairing computational efficiency and causing significant delays in real-time applications. To improve the efficiency, current methods often rely on human-defined difficulty priors, which do not align with the LLM's self-awared difficulty, leading to inefficiencies. In this paper, we introduce the Dynamic Reasoning-Boundary Self-Awareness Framework (DR. SAF), which enables models to dynamically assess and adjust their reasoning depth in response to problem complexity. DR. SAF integrates three key components: Boundary Self-Awareness Alignment, Adaptive Reward Management, and a Boundary Preservation Mechanism. These components allow models to optimize their reasoning processes, balancing efficiency and accuracy without compromising performance. Our experimental results demonstrate that DR. SAF achieves a 49.27% reduction in total response tokens with minimal loss in accuracy. The framework also delivers a 6.59x gain in token efficiency and a 5x reduction in training time, making it well-suited to resource-limited settings. During extreme training, DR. SAF can even surpass traditional instruction-based models in token efficiency with more than 16% accuracy improvement.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 29204062-b138-4686-aa5b-8a6d5f6f2aa4Builds on19
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- Let's Verify Step by StepHunter Lightman, Vineet Kosaraju, Yuri Burda, Harrison Edwards et al.ICLR 2024 · 3,045 citations
- Hybrid LLM: Cost-Efficient and Quality-Aware Query RoutingDujian Ding, Ankur Mallick, Chi Wang, Robert Sim et al.ICLR 2024 · 282 citations
- DeepMath-103K: A Large-Scale, Challenging, Decontaminated, and Verifiable Mathematical Dataset for Advancing ReasoningZhiwei He, Tian Liang, Jiahao Xu, Qiuzhi Liu et al.ICLR 2026 · 271 citations
- Training Language Models to Reason EfficientlyDaman Arora, Andrea ZanetteNeurIPS 2025 · 270 citations
Related papers
- A State-Transition Framework for Efficient LLM ReasoningLiang Zhang, Yu Zhao, Longyue Wang, Tianqi Shi et al.ICLR 2026 · 2 citations
- Does Your Reasoning Model Implicitly Know When to Stop Thinking?Zixuan Huang, Xin Xia, Yuxi Ren, Jianbin Zheng et al.ICML 2026 · 21 citations
- Unlocking the Capabilities of Thought: A Reasoning Boundary Framework to Quantify and Optimize Chain-of-ThoughtQiguang Chen, Libo Qin, Jiaqi Wang, Jingxuan Zhou et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 104 citations
- AdaMix: Adaptive Mixing for Short and Long Reasoning AdaptersHao Luo, Xiao Yan, Xinyan Li, Qiming Zeng et al.ACL 2026
- Not All Tokens Matter: Towards Efficient LLM Reasoning via Token Significance in Reinforcement LearningHanbing Liu, Lang Cao, Yuanyi Ren, Mengyu Zhou et al.ACL 2026 · 5 citations
