NeuroSelect: Learning to Select Clauses in SAT Solvers
Hongduo Liu, Peng Xu, Yuan Pu, Lihao Yin, Hui-Ling Zhen, Mingxuan Yuan, Tsung-Yi Ho, Bei Yu
Abstract
Modern SAT solvers depend on conflict-driven clause learning to avoid recurring conflicts. Deleting less valuable learned clauses is a crucial component of modern SAT solvers to ensure efficiency. However, a single clause deletion policy cannot guarantee optimal performance on all SAT instances. This paper introduces a new clause deletion metric to diversify existing clause deletion policies. Then, we propose to use machine learning to evaluate and select clause deletion policies adaptively based on the input instance. We show that our method can reduce the runtime of the state-of-the-art SAT solver Kissat by 5.8% on large industry benchmarks.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 695b32e5-2ead-4887-bd43-81e3d9ebb73cCited by top-tier papers4
- Learning from Algorithm Feedback: One-Shot SAT Solver Guidance with GNNsJan Tönshoff, Martin GroheICLR 2026 · 4 citations
- Learning Splitting Heuristics in Divide-and-Conquer SAT Solvers with Reinforcement LearningShumao Zhai, Ning GeICLR 2025
- Unsat Core Prediction through Polarity-Aware Representation Learning over Clause-Literal HypergraphsZhenchao Sun, Shuai Ma, Ping Lu, Chongyang TaoICML 2026
- Boolean Satisfiability via Imitation LearningZewei Zhang, Huan Liu, Yuanhao Yu, Jun Chen et al.ICLR 2026
Builds on3
- Rethinking Graph Transformers with Spectral AttentionDevin Kreuzer, Dominique Beaini, William L. Hamilton, Vincent Létourneau et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 854 citations
- Can Q-Learning with Graph Networks Learn a Generalizable Branching Heuristic for a SAT Solver?Vitaly Kurin, Saad Godil, Shimon Whiteson, Bryan CatanzaroNeurIPS 2020 · 77 citations
- NeuroBack: Improving CDCL SAT Solving using Graph Neural NetworksWenxi Wang, Yang Hu, Mohit Tiwari, Sarfraz Khurshid et al.ICLR 2024 · 25 citations
Related papers
- X-SAT: An Efficient Circuit-Based SAT SolverYuhang Qian, Zhihan Chen, Xindi Zhang, Shaowei CaiDAC 2025 · 4 citations
- Guiding CDCL SAT Search via Random Exploration amid Conflict DepressionMd. Solimul Chowdhury, Martin Müller, Jia-Huai YouAAAI 2020 · 5 citations
- Towards Practical Privacy-Preserving SAT SolvingGefei Tan, Wenhao Zhang, Timos Antonopoulos, Ruzica Piskac et al.CCS 2026
- Runtime vs. Extracted Proof Size: An Exponential Gap for CDCL on QBFsOlaf Beyersdorff, Benjamin Böhm, Meena MahajanAAAI 2024 · 1 citation
- Massively Parallel Continuous Local Search for Hybrid SAT Solving on GPUsYunuo Cen, Zhiwei Zhang, Xuanyao FongAAAI 2025 · 8 citations
