Unsat Core Prediction through Polarity-Aware Representation Learning over Clause-Literal Hypergraphs
Zhenchao Sun, Shuai Ma, Ping Lu, Chongyang Tao
Abstract
Graph neural networks have been widely used in Boolean satisfiability (SAT) tasks to learn structural information from SAT formulas. The goal of these studies is to solve SAT instances or to enhance SAT solvers, including tasks such as unsat-core prediction. However, most existing approaches model a SAT formula as a bipartite graph or a directed acyclic graph, which are less direct in capturing clause-level and higher-order interactions among literals and clauses. Moreover, these approaches are limited in modeling intrinsic polarity-related properties of SAT, such as the complementary relationship between the positive and negative literals of a variable. To address these limitations, we propose a polarity-aware representation learning framework over clause-literal hypergraphs. We model SAT formulas as clause-literal hypergraphs augmented with a clause incidence graph to capture higher-order structural interactions. We then introduce a polarity-aware decomposition mechanism that separates variable representations into polarity invariant and equivariant components, explicitly modeling the relationship between positive and negative literals, with the resulting literal representations propagated along the hypergraph structure. We further incorporate a polarity-inversion consistency regularization to reinforce polarity-consistent representations during training. Experimental results on multiple SAT datasets demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed approach.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext c36b242d-b910-42da-ba8b-63e2ffdde2b9Builds on6
- Can Q-Learning with Graph Networks Learn a Generalizable Branching Heuristic for a SAT Solver?Vitaly Kurin, Saad Godil, Shimon Whiteson, Bryan CatanzaroNeurIPS 2020 · 77 citations
- Predicting Propositional Satisfiability via End-to-End LearningChris Cameron, Rex Chen, Jason S. Hartford, Kevin Leyton-BrownAAAI 2020 · 49 citations
- NSNet: A General Neural Probabilistic Framework for Satisfiability ProblemsZhaoyu Li, Xujie SiNeurIPS 2022 · 30 citations
- Learning from Algorithm Feedback: One-Shot SAT Solver Guidance with GNNsJan Tönshoff, Martin GroheICLR 2026 · 4 citations
- On EDA-Driven Learning for SAT SolvingMin Li, Zhengyuan Shi, Qiuxia Lai, Sadaf Khan et al.DAC 2023 · 4 citations
Related papers
- On the Expressive Power of GNNs for Boolean SatisfiabilitySaku Peltonen, Roger WattenhoferICLR 2026 · 1 citation
- Signed Graph Neural Network with Latent GroupsHaoxin Liu, Ziwei Zhang, Peng Cui, Yafeng Zhang et al.KDD 2021 · 38 citations
- Defining and Discovering Hyper-meta-paths for Heterogeneous HypergraphsYaming Yang, Ziyu Zheng, Weigang Lu, Zhe Wang et al.NeurIPS 2025
- Hypergraph-enhanced Dual Semi-supervised Graph ClassificationWei Ju, Zhengyang Mao, Siyu Yi, Yifang Qin et al.ICML 2024 · 39 citations
- Signed Laplacian Graph Neural NetworksYu Li, Meng Qu, Jian Tang, Yi ChangAAAI 2023 · 19 citations
