NeuroBack: Improving CDCL SAT Solving using Graph Neural Networks
Wenxi Wang, Yang Hu, Mohit Tiwari, Sarfraz Khurshid, Kenneth L. McMillan, Risto Miikkulainen
Abstract
Propositional satisfiability (SAT) is an NP-complete problem that impacts many research fields, such as planning, verification, and security. Mainstream modern SAT solvers are based on the Conflict-Driven Clause Learning (CDCL) algorithm. Recent work aimed to enhance CDCL SAT solvers using Graph Neural Networks (GNNs). However, so far this approach either has not made solving more effective, or required substantial GPU resources for frequent online model inferences. Aiming to make GNN improvements practical, this paper proposes an approach called NeuroBack, which builds on two insights: (1) predicting phases (i.e., values) of variables appearing in the majority (or even all) of the satisfying assignments are essential for CDCL SAT solving, and (2) it is sufficient to query the neural model only once for the predictions before the SAT solving starts. Once trained, the offline model inference allows NeuroBack to execute exclusively on the CPU, removing its reliance on GPU resources. To train NeuroBack, a new dataset called DataBack containing 120,286 data samples is created. NeuroBack is implemented as an enhancement to a state-of-the-art SAT solver called Kissat. As a result, it allowed Kissat to solve up to 5.2% and 7.4% more problems on two recent SAT competition problem sets, SATCOMP-2022 and SATCOMP-2023, respectively. NeuroBack therefore shows how machine learning can be harnessed to improve SAT solving in an effective and practical manner.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 9ab18bf3-7897-4a3b-ac64-d3fecf3a878eCited by top-tier papers9
- Let a Neural Network be Your InvariantMirco Giacobbe, Daniel Kroening, Abhinandan Pal, Michael TautschnigNeurIPS 2025 · 6 citations
- Learning Better Representations From Less Data For Propositional SatisfiabilityMohamed Ghanem, Frederik Schmitt, Julian Siber, Bernd FinkbeinerNeurIPS 2024 · 5 citations
- Learning from Algorithm Feedback: One-Shot SAT Solver Guidance with GNNsJan Tönshoff, Martin GroheICLR 2026 · 4 citations
- NeuroSelect: Learning to Select Clauses in SAT SolversHongduo Liu, Peng Xu, Yuan Pu, Lihao Yin et al.DAC 2024 · 2 citations
- Circuit Transformer: A Transformer That Preserves Logical EquivalenceXihan Li, Xing Li, Lei Chen, Xing Zhang et al.ICLR 2025 · 1 citation
Builds on5
- An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at ScaleAlexey Dosovitskiy, Lucas Beyer, Alexander Kolesnikov, Dirk Weissenborn et al.ICLR 2021 · 21,477 citations
- Measuring and Relieving the Over-Smoothing Problem for Graph Neural Networks from the Topological ViewDeli Chen, Yankai Lin, Wei Li, Peng Li et al.AAAI 2020 · 1,353 citations
- Self-Supervised Graph Transformer on Large-Scale Molecular DataYu Rong, Yatao Bian, Tingyang Xu, Weiyang Xie et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 1,113 citations
- Scaling Vision Transformers to 22 Billion ParametersMostafa Dehghani, Josip Djolonga, Basil Mustafa, Piotr Padlewski et al.ICML 2023 · 848 citations
- Representing Long-Range Context for Graph Neural Networks with Global AttentionZhanghao Wu, Paras Jain, Matthew A. Wright, Azalia Mirhoseini et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 450 citations
Related papers
- HardCore Generation: Generating Hard UNSAT Problems for Data AugmentationJoseph Cotnareanu, Zhanguang Zhang, Hui-Ling Zhen, Yingxue Zhang et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 1 citation
- On the Expressive Power of GNNs for Boolean SatisfiabilitySaku Peltonen, Roger WattenhoferICLR 2026 · 1 citation
- Learning Plaintext-Ciphertext Cryptographic Problems via ANF-based SAT Instance RepresentationXinhao Zheng, Yang Li, Cunxin Fan, Huaijin Wu et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 7 citations
- Learning Splitting Heuristics in Divide-and-Conquer SAT Solvers with Reinforcement LearningShumao Zhai, Ning GeICLR 2025
- Predicting Propositional Satisfiability via End-to-End LearningChris Cameron, Rex Chen, Jason S. Hartford, Kevin Leyton-BrownAAAI 2020 · 49 citations
