Learning Better Representations From Less Data For Propositional Satisfiability
Mohamed Ghanem, Frederik Schmitt, Julian Siber, Bernd Finkbeiner
Abstract
Training neural networks on NP-complete problems typically demands very large amounts of training data and often needs to be coupled with computationally expensive symbolic verifiers to ensure output correctness. In this paper, we present NeuRes, a neuro-symbolic approach to address both challenges for propositional satisfiability, being the quintessential NP-complete problem. By combining certificate-driven training and expert iteration, our model learns better representations than models trained for classification only, with a much higher data efficiency -- requiring orders of magnitude less training data. NeuRes employs propositional resolution as a proof system to generate proofs of unsatisfiability and to accelerate the process of finding satisfying truth assignments, exploring both possibilities in parallel. To realize this, we propose an attention-based architecture that autoregressively selects pairs of clauses from a dynamic formula embedding to derive new clauses. Furthermore, we employ expert iteration whereby model-generated proofs progressively replace longer teacher proofs as the new ground truth. This enables our model to reduce a dataset of proofs generated by an advanced solver by 32% after training on it with no extra guidance. This shows that NeuRes is not limited by the optimality of the teacher algorithm owing to its self-improving workflow. We show that our model achieves far better performance than NeuroSAT in terms of both correctly classified and proven instances.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 3fd9bc8c-5302-45b0-9115-5cb12df3ace1Cited by top-tier papers2
- Let a Neural Network be Your InvariantMirco Giacobbe, Daniel Kroening, Abhinandan Pal, Michael TautschnigNeurIPS 2025 · 6 citations
- Learning Simple Interpolants for Linear Integer ArithmeticMinchao Wu, Naoki KobayashiNeurIPS 2025
Builds on10
- Graph Representations for Higher-Order Logic and Theorem ProvingAditya Paliwal, Sarah M. Loos, Markus N. Rabe, Kshitij Bansal et al.AAAI 2020 · 110 citations
- Baldur: Whole-Proof Generation and Repair with Large Language ModelsEmily First, Markus N. Rabe, Talia Ringer, Yuriy BrunFSE 2023 · 89 citations
- Teaching Temporal Logics to Neural NetworksChristopher Hahn, Frederik Schmitt, Jens U. Kreber, Markus Norman Rabe et al.ICLR 2021 · 78 citations
- Magnushammer: A Transformer-Based Approach to Premise SelectionMaciej Mikula, Szymon Tworkowski, Szymon Antoniak, Bartosz Piotrowski et al.ICLR 2024 · 62 citations
- Predicting Propositional Satisfiability via End-to-End LearningChris Cameron, Rex Chen, Jason S. Hartford, Kevin Leyton-BrownAAAI 2020 · 49 citations
Related papers
- NeuroBack: Improving CDCL SAT Solving using Graph Neural NetworksWenxi Wang, Yang Hu, Mohit Tiwari, Sarfraz Khurshid et al.ICLR 2024 · 25 citations
- Neural Model CheckingMirco Giacobbe, Daniel Kroening, Abhinandan Pal, Michael TautschnigNeurIPS 2024 · 17 citations
- Neuro-Symbolic Proof Generation for Scaling Systems Software VerificationBaoding He, Zenan Li, Wei Sun, Yuan Yao et al.OSDI 2026
- Improving Soft Unification with Knowledge Graph Embedding MethodsXuanming Cui, Chionh Wei Peng, Adriel Kuek, Ser-Nam LimICML 2025
- Neuro-Symbolic Execution: Augmenting Symbolic Execution with Neural ConstraintsShiqi Shen, Shweta Shinde, Soundarya Ramesh, Abhik Roychoudhury et al.NDSS 2019 · 43 citations
